Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02339493
NCT02339493CompletedNot Applicable

Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (AF-ALERT)

Brigham and Women's Hospital1 site in 1 country458 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
458
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Frequency of prescription of anticoagulation during hospitalization, at discharge, and at 90 days from enrollment.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. CHADS and CHA2DS2VASc scores predict the likelihood of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. Atrial flutter confers a similar risk of stroke as atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban is effective for prevention of thromboembolic stroke in most patients with AF. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, five options for anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, thromboprophylaxis for stroke prevention in AF is under-prescribed in the U.S., Europe, and worldwide. The investigators have previously demonstrated the efficacy of an alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) strategy for prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in at-risk hospitalized patients not receiving any thromboprophylaxis. The investigators' goal is to create and evaluate an alert-based CDS strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF or atrial flutter in a randomized controlled trial.

Detailed Description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. CHADS and CHA2DS2VASc scores predict the likelihood of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF. Atrial flutter confers a similar risk of stroke as atrial fibrillation. Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban is effective for prevention of thromboembolic stroke in most patients with AF. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, five options for anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, thromboprophylaxis for stroke prevention in AF is under-prescribed in the U.S., Europe, and worldwide. The investigators have previously demonstrated the efficacy of an alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) strategy for prevention of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) in at-risk hospitalized patients not receiving any thromboprophylaxis. The investigators' goal is to create and evaluate an alert-based CDS strategy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular AF or atrial flutter in a randomized controlled trial. The investigators have the following specific aims:

Aim #1 (Primary Efficacy Endpoint)- To assess whether an alert-based computerized decision support strategy increases prescription of anticoagulation during hospitalization, at discharge, and at 90 days from enrollment.

Hypothesis #1- An alert-based computer decision support (CDS) strategy will increase prescription of prescription of anticoagulation during hospitalization, at discharge, and at 90 days from enrollment.

Aim #2 (Secondary Efficacy Endpoint)- To determine the potential impact of an alert-based computerized decision support strategy on the frequency of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events at 90 days, defined as cerebrovascular accident, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality at 90 days from enrollment.

Hypothesis #2- This study will provide proof-of-concept data, including event rates, from which to design a larger randomized control trial to assess whether an alert-based CDS strategy will reduce the frequency of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events at 90 days, defined as cerebrovascular accident, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality at 90 days from enrollment.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
21 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •High-risk patients ≥ 21 years old with paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent nonvalvular AF or atrial flutter (CHA2DS2VASc score ≥ 1) who are not prescribed anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention and are hospitalized at BWH will be eligible for randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •<21 years old
  • •no diagnosis of AF or atrial flutter
  • •not hospitalized at BWH

Arms & Interventions

Alert Group

Experimental

If the patient is randomized to the alert group, their ordering provider will receive a computer electronic alert notifying the responsible provider that his or her patient is high-risk for stroke due to AF or atrial flutter and that the patient is not ordered to receive anticoagulant therapy.

Intervention: Computer Electronic Alert (Other)

Control Group

No Intervention

If the patient is randomized to the control group, the computer program will not issue an on-screen electronic alert.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Frequency of prescription of anticoagulation during hospitalization, at discharge, and at 90 days from enrollment.

Time Frame: 90 days

Defined as prescription of therapeutic dose anticoagulation

Secondary Outcomes

  • Frequency of composite of major adverse cardiovascular events at 90 days(90 days)
  • Frequency of major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding at 90 days(90 days)
  • Frequency of systemic embolism at 90 days(90 days)
  • Frequency of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at 90 days(90 days)
  • Frequency of acute myocardial infarction at 90 days(90 days)
  • Frequency of all cause mortality at 90 days(90 days)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Samuel Z.Goldhaber, MD

Director, Thrombosis Research Group

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Electronic Alerts for Stroke Prevention in... | Clinical Trial