Investigation of the Efficacy of Thoracic Mobilization Exercises Performed in Addition to Core Stabilization Exercises in Individuals With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Neck Pain

• Registration Number: NCT06991140
• Lead Sponsor: Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi

Brief Summary

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints worldwide and is an important health problem that restricts the daily life activities of individuals. In particular, chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) describes pain that persists for at least 12 weeks without an underlying specific pathological cause and affects a large segment of the population. CNSNP leads not only to pain but also to functional limitations, postural disorders and decreased quality of life.

In recent years, exercise-based approaches, especially core stabilisation exercises, have become prominent in the treatment of CNSNP. Core stabilisation exercises aim to increase postural control, improve segmental stability and thus reduce pain by activating deep muscle groups around the spine. However, it has been reported that exercises targeting only local muscle groups may be insufficient to meet the high-level biomechanical and neuromuscular needs of the cervical spine.

In this context, the effect of the mobility of the thoracic spine on neck function is noteworthy. Hypomobility in the thoracic region may contribute to pain and dysfunction by increasing the load on the cervical spine. Therefore, it is thought that adding thoracic mobilisation exercises to core stabilisation exercises may be more effective in improving neck pain and postural disorders.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding thoracic mobilisation to a core stabilisation exercise programme in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain.

Detailed Description

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems on a global scale and causes a significant decrease in the quality of life by negatively affecting the social, occupational and physical functionality of individuals. It is reported that approximately 30-50% of individuals experience neck pain every year and a significant proportion of these complaints become chronic. Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is defined as neck pain that persists for more than three months without an underlying anatomical or pathological cause and is the most common type of neck pain encountered in clinical practice. In the treatment of CNSNP, both symptom relief and correction of underlying mechanical disorders are important.

In rehabilitation programmes for neck pain, core stabilisation exercises are widely used to strengthen spinal stability and improve postural control by increasing activation of the deep muscles supporting the cervical and thoracic spine. The core consists of a large number of muscles and connective tissues surrounding the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine and the coordinated functioning of these structures is critical for the functional integrity of the spine. Various studies have shown that core stabilisation exercises are effective in reducing pain and increasing functional capacity.

However, the functional and mechanical health of the cervical spine is closely related not only to the local stabilising muscles but also to the mobility of the thoracic spine. Hypomobility of the thoracic spine can lead to increased compensatory motion in the cervical segments, muscle spasm, postural distortion and increased pain. There is increasing evidence in the literature that improving thoracic mobility can reduce cervical pain and dysfunction. In this context, integrating thoracic mobilisation exercises into core stabilisation programmes may provide not only symptomatic relief, but also better postural alignment and more effective functional recovery.

The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the effects of adding thoracic mobilisation exercises to core stabilisation exercises in individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. In this direction, it is aimed to evaluate the extent to which the applications for the mobility of the thoracic spine affect the clinical symptoms in the cervical region and to obtain data that will contribute to clinical rehabilitation programmes.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2024-07
• Study Start: 2024-07-01
• Primary Completion: 2025-01-15
• Study Completion: 2025-01-15
• Study First Submitted: 2025-05-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-05-22
• Study First Posted: 2025-05-25
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-05-26
• Last Update Posted: 2025-05-30

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 54

Inclusion Criteria

• To be between the ages of 18-65,
• 3 months of persistent neck pain,
• Being sedentary,
• Not being involved in any physiotherapy programme in the last 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

• History of previous spinal surgery or trauma,
• Neurological deficit, vestibular pathology, neurological, cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal problems affecting physical performance, any pathology in the shoulder joint, any pathology in the jaw joint and pregnancy

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Pain Severity	6 week	Visual Analogue Scale was used to determine severity of low back pain in the study participants. Visual Analogue Scale is a practical test with high validity and reliability in pain assessment. Visual Analogue Scale is an assessment method numbered from 0 to 10, where '0' indicates no pain and '10' indicates the presence of the most severe pain. Participants were asked to mark the degree of pain they had on this scale and recorded.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Disability	6 week	The Neck Disability Index consists of 10 headings. Participants are asked to score each question between 0 (no disability) and 5 (full disability). The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 50 (total disability). A score of 0-4 is interpreted as no disability, 5-14 as mild disability, 15-24 as moderate disability, 25-34 as severe disability and \>35 as total disability.
Sensivity	6 week	Sensitivity will be assessed with the Body Awareness Questionnaire. It is a questionnaire consisting of four subgroups (Changes in body process, sleep-wake cycle, prediction of onset of illness, prediction of body reactions) and a total of 18 statements aiming to determine the level of normal or abnormal sensitivity of body composition. The participant is asked to rate each statement with numbers between one and seven. In the questionnaire, the rating is given as a total score. A higher score indicates better body sensitivity.
Cervical muscle strength	6 week	Flexor and extensor muscle strength of the cervical region was measured with a digital hand dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument Company, USA). For the evaluation position, the fine muscle test positions and method defined by Lovett were taken as a basis. While evaluating the cervical flexors, participants were asked to flex their heads while lying in the supine position in the hook position, and the resistance was given from the frontal region. While evaluating the cervical extensors, participants were asked to extend their heads in the prone position with the arms at their sides, the resistance was given from the occipital region. All measurements were repeated three times and the highest value was recorded in kilogram.
Spine Assessment	6 week	Spine structure was assessed with the Spinal Mouse® (Idiag, Volkerswill, Switzerland) device . It is a non-invasive, radiation-free, and computer-assisted electromechanical device. The handheld wireless mouse included in the device is connected to a computer via bluetooth. The raw data reaches the computer via bluetooth and is evaluated by the software. The device has measurement options in different planes, provides the opportunity to evaluate both the posture and mobility of the spine, and gives valid, and reliable results. During the assessment, the processes spinosus of the spine from C7 to S3 were marked and the mouse was slide along the spine from top to bottom from the skin surface at a constant speed and pressure.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kırşehir Ahi Evran University; 🇹🇷 Kırsehir, Turkey