Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03434626
NCT03434626
Completed
N/A

A Randomized Trial of ACP/GCD Care Pathway in Primary Care in Alberta

McMaster University2 sites in 1 country120 target enrollmentOctober 20, 2017

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Chronic Illness
Sponsor
McMaster University
Enrollment
120
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Presence of a completed goals of care designation form in the patient chart
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Sometimes people with health conditions become ill suddenly and can no longer speak for themselves and another person (such as a family member) will make health care decisions for them. This means it is important for people to think about their wishes and tell others about them. This is called advance care planning. When people have done advance care planning, if they become very sick and cannot speak for themselves they are more likely to get the kind of health care they want and it is easier for the people who make decisions for them. In Alberta, there is a form in the health care system that is used to indicate a person's wishes if participants are unable to speak for themselves. There are tools such as brochures, questionnaires, and videos that can help participants learn about advance care planning and serious illness conversations. This research is being done to study whether using tools for advance care planning will help improve goals of care designation completion rates in such a way that they better reflect patient values. In this project, we aim to determine the efficacy of tools to increase the quality and quantity of advance care planning (ACP) and Goals of Care Determinations (GCD) in primary care settings in Alberta.

Detailed Description

In prospective and randomized trials, advance care planning (ACP) significantly improves outcomes including increased likelihood that clinicians and families understand and comply with a patient's wishes, reduces hospitalization at the end of life, results in less intensive treatments at the end of life (according to patients' wishes) and increases use of hospice services. Trials have not been done in primary care. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of a care pathway designed to increase the quality and quantity of ACP in patients and their substitute decision-makers in primary care. The study is a multi-site, patient-based, unblinded, randomized trial conducted in family practices in Canada. Participants will be patients who are determined by their physician to be able to benefit from ACP, and the patient's substitute decision-maker. Participant pairs will be randomized to immediate intervention (care pathway) or delayed (8-12 weeks). The intervention is guided use of tools and decision aids to clarify values and preferences for treatments in the event of serious illness or near end of life. The outcomes will be presence of a goals of care form in the chart, substitute decision-maker engagement in ACP (including self-efficacy for enacting the role), patient engagement in ACP, and decisional conflict.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 20, 2017
End Date
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • age 65 years or older
  • have at least one chronic condition that may be life-limiting

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to communicate with an English-speaking research coordinator

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Presence of a completed goals of care designation form in the patient chart

Time Frame: 8-12 weeks

In Alberta there is a form in the health care system that is used to indicate a person's wishes if they are unable to speak for themselves. The form is called a "Goal of Care Designation" form and is part of a package called the 'Greensleeve'. Alberta Health Services requires that all patients in primary care and in hospital have a green sleeve and goal of care designation (RMC classification: R=resuscitative; M=medical; C=comfort care).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Physician rating of decisional conflict(8-12 weeks)
  • Agreement between patient's self-reported values and preferences for life sustaining treatment, and what is documented in the form in the chart(8-12 weeks)
  • Patient-reported satisfaction with the intervention(8-12 weeks)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials