Cortico-cortical Stimulation and Robot-assisted Therapy for Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke (CCS&RAT)

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Stroke; Stroke, Ischemic
• Interventions: Device: Cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy; Device: Sham cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy

• Registration Number: NCT05478434
• Lead Sponsor: I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to tested the effect of combination of a paired associative stimulation of two functional interconnected areas of the cerebral cortex (posterior-parietal cortex and primary motor cortex) with robot-assisted therapy in the recovery of upper limb after stroke.

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND

Stroke survivors reported upper limb impairment that contribute to reducing the overall quality of life, social participation and professional activities. The impairment of the upper limb is due to motor and sensory alteration that could compromise the sensorimotor integration. The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is a potential circuit where this integration could occur during active somatosensation. Indeed, PPC is a site of massive confluence of visual, tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular signals. This area may be involved in transforming information about the location of targets in space, into signals related to motor intentions. This process likely occurs through parietal-motor connections, which are known to be involved in the transfer of relevant sensitive information for planning, reaching, and grasping. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) of PPC and primary motor area (M1), by means of bi-focal trans-cranial magnetic stimulation, can modulate M1 excitability. This information reinforces the hypothesis that modulation of PPC-M1 connectivity can be used as a new approach to modify motor excitability and sensorimotor interaction. Parallel, robot assisted training (RAT) can induce a plastic reorganization at the muscular afferents, spinal motor neurons, interneuron system and beyond and facilitates neural plasticity and motor relearning through goal-oriented training. The robotics device allows to train patients in an intensive, task-oriented, and top-down therapy way, increasing patients' compliance and motivation. The cognitive top-down stimulation is allowed by means of the introduction of visual feedback performed through exergaming. Recently, it has been proposed the development of new intervention strategies that combine neurostimulation of a target brain area with neurorehabilitation, such as physical therapy or virtual reality. Although both TMS and RAT have shown individually promising effects in upper limb recovery after a stroke, their combination has not been tested to date.

AIMS

1. To determine whether robot-assisted therapy combined with cortico-cortical non-invasive stimulation of M1 and PPC areas can improve functional recovery of upper extremity in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke.

2. To evaluate the feasibility of robot-assisted training exergaming technology for reaching and grasping training for stroke rehabilitation.

3. To investigate the neurophysiological changes in PPC-M1 connectivity (through TMS EEG) to clarify the effectiveness of PAS on neuromodulation of the PPC-M1 network.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2022-07-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-07-26
• Study First Posted: 2022-07-28
• Study Start: 2022-08-21
• Status Verified: 2024-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-02-18
• Last Update Posted: 2025-02-20
• Primary Completion: 2025-08
• Study Completion: 2025-10

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 32

Inclusion Criteria

1. first ever chronic ischemic stroke;
2. hemiparesis due to left or right subcortical or cortical lesion in the territory of the middle cerebral artery;
3. severe or moderate residual upper limb impairment (FMA < 52 in the motor domain A/D)

Exclusion Criteria

1. history of seizures;
2. severe general impairment or concomitant diseases;
3. treatment with benzodiazepines, baclofen, and antidepressants;
4. Intracranial metal implants;
5. cardiac pacemaker;
6. pregnancy status;
7. orthopedic contraindications for upper limb;
8. upper limb pain;
9. cognitive impairment (MMSE < 23);
10. presence of unilateral spatial neglect

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Robot and stimulation PPC-M1	Cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy	Combined paired pulse stimulation (PAS) with robot-assisted therapy
Robot and sham stimulation PPC-M1	Sham cortico-cortical stimulation plus robot-assisted therapy	Combined sham PAS with robot-assisted therapy

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	Comprehensive clinical measurement tool of upper limb functions after stroke. Range score form 0 to 66 points, a higher score represents an improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in the Box and Block Test	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	Clinical test of motor function of upper limb after stroke.
Change in the cortical connectivity	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	Monitoring how TMS-pulse spreads from the stimulated area to the other areas, it is possible to assess the effective connectivity that area has with a widespread of network connected. So we calculate the Coherence between different areas and other connectivity indexes in the cortical oscillatory domain, i.e. Phase-locking Value (PLV) and Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC)
Change in the functional movements of upper limb	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	Change in the kinematics variables will be recorded via inertial measurement units and motion-analysis during a three-reaching tasks and the Box-and-Block test.
Change in the Modified Ashworth Scale	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	Clinical Scale used to assessed spasticity. Range score from 0 to 5, a lower score represents an improvement.
Change in the cortical oscillations	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	From TMS-EEG recording it is possible to analyze oscillatory activity of the stimulated brain area. Monitoring the frequency band during time after TMS-pulse we calculate Time-frequency Wavelets and from there the TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP) as output of the frequency bands (Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, Gamma) expressed.
Change in the cortical excitability	baseline; 3weeks (end of treatment); 7weeks (follow-up)	Stimulating a specific area with a single pulse of TMS evoke a so called Transcranial Evoked Potential (TEP), which is a well-know index of cortical excitability of the stimulated cortical area .

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Santa Lucia Foundation; 🇮🇹 Rome, Italy