Optimizing Treatment Pathway and Clinical Desicion-making in Young Adults With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

The escalating socioeconomic burden of hip osteoarthritis has driven a strategic shift toward earlier, joint-preserving interventions. Over the past two decades, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor to cartilage injury and the development of early osteoarthritis. This recognition has not only led to the wider adoption of surgical interventions but also fueled significant advances in arthroscopic management. Yet, despite these developments, a central clinical challenge remains: determining which patients will benefit from prolonged conservative care and which require timely surgical care to optimize outcomes. Indeed, several randomized controlled trials have compared arthroscopy with conservative treatment, consistently showing that both approaches improve pain and function. Arthroscopy has demonstrated reliable short- to mid-term gains in patient-reported outcomes, while rehabilitation and conservative management also enable a substantial proportion of patients to achieve meaningful improvement. Although, these findings highlight the value of both strategies, the optimal sequence and timing of non-surgical and surgical care remains unknown.

Emerging literature makes it clear that the timing of surgical intervention is a critical factor in hip preservation. A recent multi-level systematic review showed that shorter symptom duration before arthroscopy is consistently associated with superior outcomes, including greater functional gains, higher rates of achieving clinically meaningful thresholds, and a lower risk of persistent pain. Similarly, a 10-year longitudinal study demonstrated that durable improvements are most likely when surgery is performed earlier in the disease course, whereas delays reduce the likelihood of achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds.

Together, these findings establish timing as a critical determinant of long-term outcomes and underscore the pressing need for dynamic, clinic-ready tools that can guide the transition from rehabilitation to surgery in young adults with FAIS.

However, current diagnosis and treatment planning for FAIS relies heavily on static imaging and passive clinical examination, which cannot capture the dynamic, movement-related nature of the condition. Advanced biomechanical studies have shown that patients with FAIS differ from controls not only in femoral and spinopelvic morphology[8] but also in movement strategies during hip-hinging tasks such as deep squats. While these insights have enhanced our understanding of FAIS, their clinical translation remains very limited due to ethical and practical limitations. Firstly, while CT-based 3D imaging can provide detailed morphological assessment, its relatively high radiation dose makes it unsuitable for repeated monitoring in young adults. Similarly, 3D motion analysis has demonstrated important alterations in kinematics, yet the cost, time demands, and need for technical expertise restrict its use to research laboratories. As a result, there are still no feasible, clinic-ready protocols that adequately capture the dynamic nature of FAIS for everyday decision-making. Consequently, treatment planning in young adults, including the above combination of non-surgical and surgical care, often depends on subjective judgment and limited examination factors, which increases the risk of suboptimal care.

The central challenge, therefore, is not whether FAIS should be managed conservatively or surgically, but how to effectively determine which patients are best suited for each pathway and at what point in their care. As hip preservation moves toward preventive strategies and increasingly refined arthroscopic techniques, developing practical, individualized and objective tools to support timely decision-making is essential. This project aims to directly address that need.