A Phase 3 Study to Confirm the Efficacy and Safety of Linzagolix to Treat Endometriosis-associated Pain
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Interventions
- Drug: Add-back capsule (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg)Drug: Placebo capsule to match Add-back capsule
- Registration Number
- NCT03986944
- Lead Sponsor
- Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of linzagolix administered orally once daily for 3 months at a dose of 75 mg alone or of 200 mg in combination with add-back hormone replacement therapy (ABT: estradiol (E2) 1 mg / norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg) versus placebo, in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (EAP).
- Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of linzagolix administered orally once daily at doses of 75 mg alone and 200 mg in combination with low dose ABT (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg) versus placebo in the management of moderate to severe EAP in 450 women.
Eligible subjects who have completed the 6-month treatment period may enter a separate extension study for 6 additional months of active treatment (no placebo control). Subjects who do not continue in the extension study will enter a 6 month treatment-free follow-up phase.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 85
The subject must have:
- Her most recent surgical and - if available - histological diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis up to 10 years before screening.
- Moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain during the screening period.
- Regular menstrual cycles.
- BMI ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit.
Key
The subject will be excluded if she:
- Is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the treatment period of the study.
- Is less than 6 months postpartum or 3 months postabortion/ miscarriage at the time of entry into the screening period.
- Has had a surgical history of any major abdominal surgery within 6 months or any interventional surgery for endometriosis performed within a period of 2 months before screening.
- Did not respond to prior treatment with GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis.
- Has a history of, or known, osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
- Has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic or other chronic therapy which would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis-associated pain.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Linzagolix 200 mg + Add-back (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) Placebo tablet to match 75 mg linzagolix tablet - Placebo Placebo tablet to match 75 mg linzagolix tablet - Placebo Placebo tablet to match 200 mg linzagolix tablet - Linzagolix 200 mg + Add-back (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) 200 mg linzagolix tablet - Placebo Placebo capsule to match Add-back capsule - Linzagolix 75 mg Placebo tablet to match 200 mg linzagolix tablet - Linzagolix 75 mg Placebo capsule to match Add-back capsule - Linzagolix 75 mg 75 mg linzagolix tablet - Linzagolix 200 mg + Add-back (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) Add-back capsule (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Dysmenorrhea Baseline to Month 3 Change at Month 3 from baseline in the mean daily assessment of dysmenorrhea (DYS) measured on a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using an electronicdiary
* The 4-point VRS scale for DYS ranges from 0 to 3 (0: No pain; 1: Mild pain; 2: Moderate pain; 3: Severe pain).
* A negative change in scores would be indicative of an improvement in the pain of DYS.Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Baseline to Month 3 Change at Month 3 from baseline in the mean daily assessment of non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) measured on a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using anelectronic diary
* The 4-point VRS scale for NMPP ranges from 0 to 3 (0: No pain; 1: Mild pain; 2: Moderate pain; 3: Severe pain).
* A negative change in scores would be indicative of an improvement in the NMPP.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (112)
Birmingham OBGYN / ID # 740
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Mesa Obstetricians and Gyneocologists / ID # 790
🇺🇸Mesa, Arizona, United States
Precision Trials AZ, LLC / ID # 783
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Quality of LIfe Medical & Research Center, LLC / ID # 813
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
Visions Clinical Research-Tucson / ID # 754
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
Lynn Institute of the Ozarks / ID # 826
🇺🇸Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Applied Research Center of Arkansas / ID # 735
🇺🇸Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Join Clinical Trials / ID # 778
🇺🇸Huntington Park, California, United States
Long Beach Clinical Trials, LLC / ID # 768
🇺🇸Long Beach, California, United States
Matrix Clinical Research / ID # 751
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Scroll for more (102 remaining)Birmingham OBGYN / ID # 740🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States