Mobilization With Movement in Distal Radial Fractures
- Conditions
- PainAcute PainMobility Limitation
- Interventions
- Other: TENS, exerciseOther: Mulligan mobilisation
- Registration Number
- NCT05976724
- Lead Sponsor
- Ahi Evran University Education and Research Hospital
- Brief Summary
Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common upper extremity disorders encountered in clinical practice. With an understanding of the mechanics of distal radius fractures, surgical intervention, and bone healing, the therapist can modify the therapy program according to the patient's individual needs. The therapeutic process is begun in the crucial stage of bone healing during fracture immobilization. By addressing edema reduction and early range of motion of the uninvolved joints, most problems can be avoided before cast or fixator removal. Rehabilitation following the immobilization period should focus on regaining wrist movements provided that earlier problems have been addressed properly. During the rehabilitative process, the therapist can incorporate scar management, modalities, joint mobilization, active and passive range of motion, splinting, and strengthening to maximize the patient's functional result.
Massage and mobilization techniques are used in the treatment of DRF due to their analgesic effects. The painless mobilization with movement technique (MWM, developed by Brian Mulligan) is a manual therapy method applies to correct the limitation of movement in the joint and to relieve pain and functional disorders. Many studies have shown that MWM technique provides faster and momentary painless joint movement compared to other physical therapy modalities. The patient group with DRF has a large place in the general population and long treatment processes cause both labour loss and economic loss. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of MWM technique in cases with distal radius fractures.
- Detailed Description
In this study, 42 DRF patients with age range 18-65 who applied to Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Training and Research Hospital were examined. The individuals included in the study were divided into two groups according to the paired randomization method. These groups were control and intervention groups. Traditional physiotherapy methods were applied to the control group, traditional physiotherapy and MWM techniques were applied to the intervention group. Traditional physiotherapy methods were included; Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), stretching and strengthening exercises.
For the evaluation of patients; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), wrist goniometric measurements, grip strength measurement, pinch strength measurement, edema measurement and Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) were used.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 53
- Patients with distal radius fracture
- Patients with polytrauma,
- open fracture,
- ulnar head fracture (excluding ulnar styloid fracture),
- history of complex regional pain syndrome,
- limited cognitive capacity were excluded
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mobilization with movement TENS, exercise Mobilization with movement technique and traditional physiotherapy will be applied to the intervention group. Also patients will receive a traditional therapy program consisting of Conventional TENS and stretching and strengthening exercises. Mobilization with movement Mulligan mobilisation Mobilization with movement technique and traditional physiotherapy will be applied to the intervention group. Also patients will receive a traditional therapy program consisting of Conventional TENS and stretching and strengthening exercises. Control group TENS, exercise Patients will receive a traditional therapy program consisting of Conventional TENS and stretching and strengthening exercises.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 0-5 week Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). As a simple and commonly applied method, VAS is considered to be both valid and reliable in measuring patient pain intensity. The patients in the current study were each asked with indicating the intensity of their pain experienced within the past 24 hours by marking on a 10-cm line scale, where 0 = "No pain" and 10 = "Maximum pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
İsmail Ceylan
🇹🇷Kırşehir, Merkez, Turkey