Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06859567
NCT06859567Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Proving the Efficacy of the Chester Step Test in Scleroderma Patients Compared with the 6-Minute Walk Test

Firat University1 site in 1 country45 target enrollmentStarted: March 11, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
45
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Modified Borg Scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is a chronic autoimmune disease in which autoimmune features are associated with vascular manifestations. Patients with SSC experience many problems such as interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), heart failure, severe gastrointestinal tract (GIT) involvement and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). Because of these problems, SSC patients may develop an abnormal pulmonary hemodynamic response during exercise. In this situation, measuring the aerobic capacity of SSC patients can be a useful tool for health promotion. There are many different methods for measuring aerobic capacity tests. The most commonly used aerobic capacity test in SSC patients is the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). However, although the 6 MWT is a commonly used test, it has some disadvantages. Because SSC affects multiple organs, there are doubts about the 6 MWT's ability to accurately assess these diseases. These disadvantages of the 6MWT have led to the search for new tests. The Chester step test (CST) is a submaximal test and a good option to assess aerobic capacity. An adapted version of the CST for non-healthy individuals can be used to assess aerobic capacity. There are some studies conducted with CST. As a result of my research, no study evaluating CST in individuals with SSC was found.

Detailed Description

Systemic sclerosis (SSC) is a chronic autoimmune disease with autoimmune features combined with vascular manifestations. Systemic sclerosis (SSC), the main symptom of which is skin sclerosis, is a marker that can detect the activity of the disease. Apart from skin involvement, SSC affects many internal organs such as the musculoskeletal system, gastrointestinal system, lungs, heart and kidneys. Because of these problems, SSC patients may develop an abnormal pulmonary hemodynamic response during exercise. This can lead to symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue and decreased exercise tolerance. In this situation, measuring the aerobic capacity of SSC patients can be a useful tool in health promotion. There are many different methods for measuring aerobic capacity tests. The most commonly used aerobic capacity test in SSC patients is the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT). However, although the 6 MWT is a commonly used test, it has some disadvantages. Because SSC affects multiple organs, there are doubts about the 6 MWT's ability to accurately assess these diseases. For an accurate 6MWT assessment, a 30 meter corridor is needed. This length of corridor is impossible to access in some clinics. These disadvantages of the 6MWT have led to the search for new tests. The Chester step test (CST) is a submaximal test and a good option for assessing aerobic capacity. Compared to 6 MWT, CST has the advantage of requiring portable equipment. It is a cost-effective option to assess exercise tolerance, fatigue and dyspnea. Because of these advantages of the CST, it can be used to assess aerobic capacity when adapted to non-healthy individuals. There are some studies conducted with CST. As a result of my research, no study evaluating CST in individuals with SSC was found. The study will be conducted at Firat University Hospital and 45 patients will be evaluated. After the demographic data of the patients included in the study are recorded, 6MWT will be performed and the results will be recorded. Then CST will be performed and the results will be recorded.6 Dyspnea, fatigue and leg fatigue will be evaluated with the Modified Borg Scale before and after MWT and CST. The patient's heart rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure will be recorded before and after the tests. In addition, the patient's heart rate and oxygen saturation will be recorded after each level passed in CST.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Over 18 years old
  • •Patients who can walk independently without an assistive device

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • •Myocardial infarction history
  • •Congestive heart failure
  • •Serious or unstable illness that may limit exercise tolerance
  • •Presence of severe musculoskeletal and joint disorders that may interfere with the conduct of the test
  • •Inability to perform the simplest level of the Chester step test
  • •Arthroplasty or major operations on knee and hip joints
  • •Uncontrolled hypertension
  • •Lack of ability to understand and implement all recommended procedures

Arms & Interventions

Evaluated Group

Active Comparator

6 minute walk test, Chester step test

Intervention: Evaluation (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Modified Borg Scale

Time Frame: up to 30 minutes

The modified Borg scale is a validated scale for subjective perception of dyspnea used with the 6MWT to confirm the degree of respiratory distress. Exercise intensity is determined by individualized measurement. The 2002 guidelines of the American Thoracic Society recommend the modified Borg scale as an adjunct to the 6MWT. This scale is a vertical scale measured from 0 to 10. Here 0 represents no symptoms and 10 represents maximum symptoms. In this study, the modified Borg scale will be used to rate dyspnea and leg fatigue. The Borg scale will be printed out and this printout will be used for patient enumeration. The patient will be told what the numbers from 0 to 10 on the Borg scale mean. After instructions have been given, the patient will be asked to rate dyspnea and leg fatigue before and after the test and the numbers will be recorded.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Firat University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Havvagül Doğan

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Firat University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Chester Step Test: is It Effective in... | Clinical Trial