JPRN-UMIN000010581已完成未知
OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) - Imaging Study - OPINION Trial - Imaging Study
Translational Research Informatics Center, Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation (TRI)0 个研究点目标入组 106 人开始时间: 2013年4月24日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 106
研究概览
简要总结
The minimal lumen area was comparable in both groups (p = 0.18).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20years-old 至 85years-old（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •1) Considered as unsuitable by the investigator 2) Patients deemed as difficult to perform additional OFDI or IVUS procedure 3) Patients deemed as difficult to perform OFDI procedure at 8 month after PCI
研究者
相似试验
已完成
3 期
OPtical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus INtravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary InterventiON - OPINION ImagingCoronary Artery DiseaseNCT01873222Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan106
已完成
3 期
OFDI vs. IVUS in ACSAcute coronary syndromeJPRN-jRCTs052190093Otake Hiromasa158
已完成
3 期
OPtical Frequency Domain Imaging vs. INtravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary InterventiONCoronary Artery DiseaseNCT01873027Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan829
Unknown
2 期
Comparison Between OFDI and IVUS in PCI Guidance for Biolimus A9 Eluting Stent ImplantationCoronary Artery DiseaseNCT03292081Fujita Health University96
已完成
不适用
DOCTOR Compare - A Study in the "DOCTOR" Series (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization?"Coronary DiseaseMyocardial InfarctionAtherosclerosisNCT02237456Aarhus University Hospital Skejby11