Measurement and Treatment of Back Pain
- Conditions
- Back Pain
- Interventions
- Device: LaserDevice: Positive Pressure and LaserDevice: Ultrasound and LaserDevice: Placebo LaserDevice: Negative pressure and Laser
- Registration Number
- NCT06245863
- Lead Sponsor
- State University of Minas Gerais
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical aspects and to investigate the therapeutic effects of combined therapy with laser on back pain.
- Detailed Description
Dysfunctions of the musculoskeletal system are related to physiological, kinesiological and biomechanical factors that result in pain, paresthesia, inflammation, heaviness, fatigue and compression of peripheral nerves. Clinical aspects related to back pain were investigated. For treatment, photobiomodulation can be performed with laser equipment that emits red and infrared light, which promotes analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Mechanical stimulus can be combined with laser to improve therapeutical effects. In this context, the laser was combined with ultrasound, negative pressure and positive pressure to treat back pain.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- Volunteers (female and male)
- Aged between 20 and 60 years
- Who had medical referral for pain complaint in low back
- Psychiatric illnesses
- Endocrinopathies
- Heart diseases
- Neurological diseases
- Osteoporosis
- Cancer
- Analgesic, anti-inflammatory or muscle relaxant drugs in the last four weeks
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Laser Laser Infrared Laser on back pain. Positive Pressure and Laser: Combined Therapy Positive Pressure and Laser Rollers combined with laser on back pain. Ultrasound and Laser: Combined Therapy Ultrasound and Laser Ultrasound combined with laser on back pain. Placebo Laser Placebo Laser The placebo laser treatment. Negative pressure and Laser: Combined Therapy Negative pressure and Laser Vacuum therapy combined with laser on back pain.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Intensity 1 day and 7 weeks Visual analogue scale (VAS): The volunteer was instructed to give a score for pain intensity between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Algometry - Pressure threshold measurement 1 day and 7 weeks Pain pressure threshold on low back using algometer. Data obtained in Newton. Higher pressure pain threshold is reported for lower pain sensitivity.
Dynamometry - Strenght measurement 1 day and 7 weeks Isometric trunk strength using dynamometer. Data obtained in Newton. greater the value, greater the strength.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anamnesis 1 day Questionnaire to get the clinical characteristics of patients.
Waist-hip ratio (WHR) measurement 1 day Waist-hip ratio: WHR = waist (cm) / hips (cm). The anatomical landmarks to measure the circumference (cm), in the upright position of the body were: 1) waist: measured at the above the iliac crest; 2) hip: measured at the largest protuberance of the buttocks. Classification: Gynoid (WHR between 0.68 and 0.8) and Android (WHR\>0.8).
Body mass index (BMI) measurement 1 day Body mass index: BMI = mass (kg) / height2 (m). Classification: BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 are underweight, BMI between 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 is considered normal weight, BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m2 is considered overweight, and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² is considered obese. Obesity is divided into grades; grade I being a BMI between 30 to 34.9 kg/m², grade II being a BMI 35 to 39.9 kg/m² and grade III BMI ≥ 40 kg/m².
Body composition measurement 1 day Body composition was performed to evaluate the hydration and the body fat percentage using bipolar bioimpedance.
Quality of life assessment 1 day and 7 weeks Quality of Life was measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Abbreviated form (WHOQOL-BREF), a 26-item questionnaire in which items are rated on a 5-point scale. It evaluates 4 domains related to physical factors, psychological factors, social relationships, and environmental context. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
Flexibility of the spine 1 day and 7 weeks Fingertip-to-floor test was carried out. In upright standing position with knees joint fully extended, the volunteers were instructed to bend forward and attempt to reach for the floor with their fingertips. The distance between the patient's right long finger and the floor were measured using a measuring tape. Three measurements were taken to calculate the average value.
Goniometry - Angular measurement 1 day and 7 weeks Active goniometry was performed to assess range of motion (ROM) of the spine (angular measure).
Shoulder mobility measurement 1 day and 7 weeks Bilateral range of motion was assessed, combining internal rotation with shoulder adduction and external rotation with abduction of the other shoulder, placing the hand on the central axis of the body in the thoracic region. Three distance measurements were obtained on both sides between the third fingers of the right and left hands to calculate the average.
Well-being assessment 1 day and 7 weeks The Subjective Well-Being Scale (EBES) was answered by patients. It is composed of 62 items related to three factors that evaluate subjective well-being: positive affect; negative affection and satisfaction with life versus life dissatisfaction. The first 47 items measure positive and negative affect using a 5-point scale with ratings from "not at all" to "to a great extent". The last 22 items measure life satisfaction (or dissatisfaction) using a 5-point scale with ratings from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fernanda Rossi Paolillo
🇧🇷Passos, Minas Gerais, Brazil