Bedside Silo Versus Attempted Operative Closure for Gastroschisis
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 38
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Length of hospitalization
研究概览
简要总结
The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different closure strategies for gastroschisis to determine if there is a difference in the two approaches.
详细描述
The hypothesis is that there is no difference between bedside silo placement and operative closure in return of bowel function, ventilator dependence, or length of stay.
The primary outcome variable between the two techniques will be length of hospitalization. The likely variables will be length of time to meet discharge criteria, length of hospitalization, time to full feedings, time on mechanical ventilation and total hospital charges.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 5 Minutes 至 2 Days（Child）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Infants with gastroschisis
排除标准
- •Born prior to 34 weeks estimated gestational age
- •Another congenital anomaly influencing the respiratory status, gastrointestinal status, or the length of hospitalization and recovery.
- •Inability to get parental permission before treatment.
结局指标
主要结局
Length of hospitalization
时间窗: 1-6 weeks
The length of time required for meeting discharge criteria
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Shawn St. Peter
Associate Professor
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City