MedPath

Distal Femur Fx: ORIF(Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) vs DFR (Distal Femur Replacement Total Knee Arthroplasty)

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Distal Femur Fracture
Interventions
Other: Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures
Other: Timed Up and Go Test on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture
Other: Koos Jr assesment on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fractures
Other: Koos Jr assesment on subjects with DFR of distal femur fracture
Registration Number
NCT05792189
Lead Sponsor
University of Florida
Brief Summary

Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score)

Detailed Description

Supracondylar femur periprosthetic fractures about a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a catastrophic and challenging complication of TKA and unfortunately are increasing in incidence. Fixation of these fractures can be challenging due to altered anatomy for the TKA and the presence of the metallic femoral component and have a relatively high complication rate. As a result, some surgeons elect to treat these fractures with a distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR). Several small retrospective studies have compared outcomes with mixed results. To the authors' knowledge there are no prospective studies evaluating the outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate periprosthetic femur fractures treated with ORIF or DFR and compare various outcomes measures (Get up and go times, KOOS Jr score).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • English speaking patients
  • 55 years or older with Su Type II or Su Type II periprosthetic femur fractures requiring surgical intervention and are medically fit to undergo surgical intervention
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with an active total knee prosthetic infection
  • Patients unable to undergo surgical intervention
  • Patient with an open fracture
  • Non-English-speaking patients
  • Oncologic/pathologic fracture
  • Poly-trauma patient (or other associated major orthopaedic injuries)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fractureKoos Jr assesment on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fracturesSu Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing ORIF for a minimum of 2 years
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fractureTimed Up and Go Test on subjects with ORIF of distal femur fracturesSu Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing ORIF for a minimum of 2 years
Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fractureTimed Up and Go Test on subjects with DFR of distal femur fractureSu Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing DFR for a minimum of 2 years
Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fractureKoos Jr assesment on subjects with DFR of distal femur fractureSu Type 2 or 3 periprosthetic distal femur fractures about a total knee after undergoing DFR for a minimum of 2 years
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal femur fractureUp to 2 years

Subjects will perform the Timed Up and Go Test, This test is used to assess mobility. Subjects are asked to wear regular footwear and can use their walking device as needed. Subjects begin by sitting in a standard armchair. Next participants are instructed to walk 10 feet to a designated line at a normal pace. Once they reach the line they are to turn and walk back to the chair and sit down. The test starts on the study staff go signal and ends once the subject is fully seated in the chair.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Distal femur replacement total knee arthroplasty (DFR) of distal femur fractureUp to 2 years

Subjects will complete the KOOS Jr assessment. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the patient's opinion about the health, symptoms, and functionality of their knee. It is a 42-item questionnaire, including 5 subscales: symptoms, pain, ADLs, sports/recreation, and quality of life. The maximum score a patient can achieve is 100, indicating no knee problems. The minimum score is zero, indicating severe knee problems.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

UF & Shands Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute

🇺🇸

Gainesville, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath