A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing pelvic floor treatment by a pelvic floor physiotherapist, versus extracorporeal magnetic stimulation, for women with stress urinary incontinence.
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Stress urinary incontinencePhysical Medicine / Rehabilitation - PhysiotherapyRenal and Urogenital - Other renal and urogenital disorders
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12611000861954
- Lead Sponsor
- St George Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 38
Inclusion Criteria
Women with a primary symptoms of stress urinary incontinence
Exclusion Criteria
People whose primary language is other than English
Women who are pregnant
Children/ young people (ie. under18 years)
People with an intellectual or mental impairment
People highly dependant on medical care
People with metal prosthesis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 24 hour pad test[At the beginning of trial (at commencement of treatment), at four months (at completion of treatment) and again at six months.];Pelvic floor muscle grading (using Modified Oxford scale) via a vaginal examiantion[At the beginning of the trial and at four months.]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of life score (ICIQ-SF)[At the beginning of the trial, at four months and again at six months.];Cost of treatment will be calculated by adding up the estimated cost of five physiotherapy treatment versus twenty chair sessions[At completion of trial]