Physiotulle vs Urgotul in the Treatment of Leg Ulcer
- Conditions
- Leg Ulcers
- Interventions
- Device: PhysiotulleDevice: URGOTUL
- Registration Number
- NCT01238419
- Lead Sponsor
- Coloplast A/S
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the pain at removal of Physiotulle dressing in comparison with that of Urgotul dressing in patients presenting a venous (or predominantly) venous leg ulcer.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 188
- Patient of either sex over 18 who have not been declared legally incompetent and who having given his written informed consent
- Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer (ankle-brachial index > 0.8)
- Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer in granulation phase (granulation tissue > 70 %)
- Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer with low exsudate
- Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer with a wound surface between 4 cm虏 and 170 cm虏
- Patient with venous or predominantly venous leg ulcer that has been treated with an appropriate compression in the two weeks prior to inclusion
- Patient available to be monitored for at least 4 weeks
- Patient able to answer questionnaires and particularly to evaluate his pain
- Patient whose leg ulcer is locally infected (At least 3 of 5 clinical signs suggestive of infection *)* 5 signs suggestive of infection: pain, exsudate, smell, oedema, erythema
- Patient requiring an analgesic treatment for the care (before dressing removal)
- Patient whose ulcer belongs to angiodermatitis type or demonstrates a vasculitis
- Patient with arterial ulcer
- Patient with purely traumatic, infectious or neoplastic origin ulcer
- Patient with a diabetic neuropathy of lower limbs
- Patient with a known allergy to one of Physiotulle or Urgotul components
- Patient already participating in another clinical study
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
Patient who have been taking corticoids > 10mg / day or cytostatics by systematic way for the three months prior to inclusion
Patient who have undergone surgery of saphenous trunk in the two months prior to inclusion
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Physiotulle Physiotulle - Urgotul URGOTUL -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method pain at dressing removal 4 weeks pain at dressing removal assessed by the patient immediately after dressing removal on a VAS scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Relative reduction of the area of the leg ulcer measured by planimetry at final point at week 4 compared to the area at inclusion 4weeks Number of patients with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability 4 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (29)
Bispebjerg ^Hospital
馃嚛馃嚢Bispebjerg, NV, Denmark
CH Le Mans
馃嚝馃嚪Le Mans, France
H么pital Dupuytren
馃嚝馃嚪Limoges, France
CHU Caremeau
馃嚝馃嚪Nimes, France
CHRU La Miletrie
馃嚝馃嚪Poitiers, France
H么pital lariboisiere
馃嚝馃嚪Paris, France
CH Cornouailles
馃嚝馃嚪Quimper, France
H么pital de Saint Gaudens
馃嚝馃嚪Saint Gaudens, France
Centre hospitalier intercommunal
馃嚝馃嚪Saint Germain en Laye, France
Clinique Pasteur
馃嚝馃嚪Toulouse, France
CHIVA
馃嚝馃嚪Foix, France
H么pital Corention Celton
馃嚝馃嚪Issy les Moulineaux, France
Clinique Mathilde
馃嚝馃嚪Rouen, France
HIA Sainte Anne
馃嚝馃嚪Toulon, France
CHRU Tours
馃嚝馃嚪Tours, France
Cabinet Medical
馃嚝馃嚪Sarrebourg, France
H么pital jacques Monod
馃嚝馃嚪Montivilliers, France
CH
馃嚝馃嚪Valenciennes, France
Arhus Sygehus
馃嚛馃嚢Arhus, Denmark
Odense Universitets Hospital
馃嚛馃嚢Odense, Denmark
Cabilet Medical
馃嚝馃嚪Abbeville, France
CHU Sud
馃嚝馃嚪Amiens, France
Centre Hospitalier
馃嚝馃嚪Haguenau, France
H么pital de Freyming
馃嚝馃嚪Freyming Merleback, France
Cabinet M茅dical
馃嚝馃嚪Luneville, France
CHU
馃嚝馃嚪Caen, France
H么pital Manchester
馃嚝馃嚪Charlevilles M茅zi猫res, France
Centre Hospitalier de Douai
馃嚝馃嚪Douai, France
CHD Les Oudairies
馃嚝馃嚪La Roche sur Yon, France