Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Shoulder Surgery

Clinical outcome studies have been performed in the evaluation of a variety of shoulder pathologies after surgical treatment. Among these disease processes include glenohumeral osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, acromioclavicular separations and scapulothoracic bursitis. A variety of outcomes studies have been performed on these pathologies although few have utilized several functional outcome measures. Also with respect to each of these diagnoses, several specific areas of research regarding outcomes assessment have not been investigated.

Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is one of the most common shoulder pathologies treated by orthopedic surgeons. For endstage osteoarthritis, an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty provides excellent pain relief and functional improvement. In order to perform the replacement, the rotator cuff tendon in the front of the shoulder (subscapularis) needs to be taken down and then repaired at the completion of the case. There are three basic methods of takedown and repair: tenotomy, peel-off and lesser tuberosity osteotomy. The osteotomy has been compared clinically to tenotomy and found to provide a lower rate of subscapularis tears, higher outcome scores and universal healing evaluated using ultrasound and the PENN shoulder score.1 Gerber et al has also evaluated long-term outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with lesser osteotomy using the Constant score as a measure of outcomes.2 Unfortunately, many outcome studies evaluating total shoulder arthroplasty utilize the Simple Shoulder Test and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score which have not been evaluated. Also, osteotomy was performed only utilizing a "fleck" of bone instead of the entire lesser tuberosity. No studies to date have evaluated TSA with an osteotomy of the entire lesser tuberosity.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has shown be a predictable operation for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy with clinical improvements in both pain and function at long term. 3,4 Dislocation has been reported between 0% to 9% after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and has been defined as one of the top three most common complications associated with reverse TSA.3-10 There is considerable debate regarding whether the subscapularis tendon needs repair after reverse TSA. Edwards et al reported a statistically significant reduction in dislocation rates from 9% to 0% with addition of subscapularis repair.10 These results had significant bias with regards to randomization of patients. Similarly, all patients in the non-repair group were at the initial portion of his learning curve. Consequently, the risk for instability is likely lower than reported in his series.

Acromioclavicular joint separations represent one of the most common shoulder injuries accounting for approximately 9% of shoulder girdle injuries.11 Acromioclavicular injuries have been classified with increasing severity from I to VI based upon disruption of the various ligamentous and muscular supports including the acromioclavicular ligaments, coracoclavicular ligaments and deltotrapezial fascia.12 Recommended initial treatment for grade I to III injuries has been nonoperative with reasonable clinical results while initial surgical stabilization has been recommended for higher grade injuries.12-15

A variety of surgical stabilization techniques for acromioclavicular joint separations have been reported including the transfer of the coracoacromial ligament from the acromion to the end of the resected distal clavicle originally described by Weaver and Dunn in 1972.16 A modification of the Weaver-Dunn acromioclavicular reconstruction was subsequently described which included coracoclavicular stabilization with nonabsorbable suture.17 Despite this modification, residual subluxation or dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint has been identified in up to 29% of patients.17 Consequently, alternative constructs have been described including an anatomic reconstruction utilizing a tendon graft which has been shown to have superior biomechanical strength compared to a Weaver-Dunn reconstruction.18