MedPath

Medial Rectus Fenestration vs Recession for PAET

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Partially Accommodative Esotropia
Interventions
Procedure: medial rectus fenestration
Procedure: medial rectus recession
Registration Number
NCT06298929
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

This prospective comparative study aims to compare medial rectus (MR) muscle fenestration and recession in patients with partially accommodative esotropia (PAET). The main question it aims to answer is whether MR fenestration is equally effective as MR recession for PAET.

All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment. Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups; Group 1 will receive conventional MR recession, and Group 2 will receive MR fenestration.

Detailed Description

Inclusion criteria The study will include patients with accommodative esotropia if the residual distance deviation with full cycloplegic correction is \> 15PD.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Patients with convergence excess esotropia, defined as a near deviation with glasses exceeding that for distance by 15 PD or more.

2. Patients with paralytic or restrictive strabismus.

3. Patients with previous strabismus surgery

4. Patients with neurologic, ocular, or developmental disorders or follow-up less than 6 months

All patients will receive complete ophthalmic and orthoptic assessment including:

i) A full ophthalmological assessment including history taking, measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination, as well as a dilated fundus examination.

ii) Measurement of the deviation at distance (6 m) and near (33 cm). iii) Assessment of ductions and versions in all cardinal directions of gaze

Patients will be randomly allocated using a random table to one of two groups:

1. Group 1: Unilateral or bilateral conventional MR recession. Augmented formula will be used to decide the Surgical dosage using the standard tables (3)

2. Group 2: unilateral or bilateral MR fenestration All surgeries will be performed by one experienced surgeon (H.SH)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with accommodative esotropia if the residual distance deviation with full cycloplegic correction is > 15PD.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. convergence excess esotropia.
  2. paralytic or restrictive strabismus.
  3. previous strabismus surgery
  4. neurologic, ocular, or developmental disorders or follow-up less than 6 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group 1medial rectus fenestrationpatients with PAET who will receive unilateral or bilateral MR fenestration
Group 2medial rectus recessionpatients with PAET who will receive unilateral or bilateral MR recession
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ocular alignment (measured in prism diopters)6 months postoperative

The distance and near angles of deviation, with and without glasses, and the angle disparity

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ocular motility6 months postoperative

ductions of both eyes (graded on a scale of nine points from -4 to +4)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tanta University

🇪🇬

Tanta, Gharbeya, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath