Post-marketing Clinical Investigation to Assess Real-life Usage Effectiveness, Safety and Patient Satisfaction of a Range of Hypertonic Seawater-based Decongestant Nasal Sprays
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis
- Sponsor
- Laboratoire de la Mer
- Enrollment
- 534
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- URTI population : Effectiveness to improve nasal congestion
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The brief of this observational study is to evaluate usage, efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of a range of hypertonic seawater-based decongestant nasal sprays in general population.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Usage,
- Efficacy,
- Safety,
- Satisfaction, in real-life usage with children, adults and pregnant or breastfeeding women. Participants will use the nasal spray as usual habits and complete daily questionnaires.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Subject coming to pharmacy for spontaneous purchase of one of the medical device under investigation.
- •Subject willing to buy one of the medical device under investigation following advice from pharmacist, general practitioner or any other health care professionals.
- •Adult and children from 3 years old in compliance with the information for use.
- •Subject presenting moderate nasal congestion or more.
- •Subject agreeing to follow the study requirements during the whole study period.
- •Subject having daily access to internet in order to answer online questionnaire.
- •Subject able to understand verbal and written local language and in capacity to fill-in questionnaire himself.
- •Subject able to give inform consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subject with contraindications according to the information for use.
- •Hypersensitivity or know allergy to any component of the product.
- •Subject taking part in another clinical study or being in the exclusion period of another clinical study.
- •Subject already included once in this study or having a family member already included in this study for the same indication.
- •Vulnerable subject (except children, pregnant and breastfeeding women).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
URTI population : Effectiveness to improve nasal congestion
Time Frame: URTI: 3 days
URTI: Assess effectiveness to improve nasal congestion in real world usage (6-point Likert scale) 6-point-Likert scale: 0 (None) - 1 (Very mild) - 2 (Mild) - 3 (Moderate) - 4 (Strong) - 5 (Very strong). Higher score means a worse outcome
AR population: Effectiveness to improve nasal congestion
Time Frame: AR: 7 days
Allergic Rhinitis (AR) : Assess effectiveness to improve nasal congestion in real world usage (6-point Likert scale) 6-point-Likert scale: 0 (None) - 1 (Very mild) - 2 (Mild) - 3 (Moderate) - 4 (Strong) - 5 (Very strong). Higher score means a worse outcome
Secondary Outcomes
- Effectiveness to improve overall nasal symptoms (night-time)(AR: Day 0 - Day 21)
- Usage(AR: Day 0 - Day 21)
- Tolerance(AR: Day 10 + Day 21)
- Safety of the medical device(AR: Day 0 - Day 21)
- Patient satisfaction(AR: Day 10 + Day 21)
- Sensory profile(AR: Day 10 + Day 21)
- Effectiveness to improve overall nasal symptoms (daytime)(AR: Day 0 - Day 21)
- Effectiveness to improve quality of life(AR: Day 0 - Day 21)
- Relief of nasal symptoms(URTI: Day 1 - Day 14)
- Onset of action & Duration(AR: Day 0 - Day 21)