跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06643273
NCT06643273招募中不适用

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effects of Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation on Sensory and Cognitive Impairments in Subjects With Stroke. The SCORES (Sensory and Cognitive Outcomes of Robotic Exercises in Stroke) Study. Evaluation of a Haptic Glove.

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 126 人开始时间: 2024年10月4日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
126
试验地点
6
主要终点
Number and types of the haptic glove malfunctions that occurred during the study, along with their descriptions (Feasibility evaluation)

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the SCORES Haptic Glove Study is to assess the technical features, safety, and reliability of a sensor-equipped glove designed to evaluate tactile perception. This will help guide further technical and functional improvements to finalize the device. The secondary goal is to validate a new tactile sensitivity index based on data collected using the glove. This will be done in a randomized controlled multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06109324) aimed to compare the effectiveness of robotic upper limb rehabilitation to conventional treatment in improving cognitive and sensory deficits, as well as evaluating the impact of these deficits on motor recovery.

详细描述

Sensory and proprioceptive deficits in the upper limbs affect about 50-85% of stroke survivors. These deficits can impact single sensations (such as primary tactile senses like light touch, pressure, and localization) and the ability to discriminate between different materials or temperatures, as well as proprioception and multiple somatosensory modalities. Furthermore, somatosensory deficits have been strongly correlated with variations in treatment responses among patients. However, in clinical practice, the use of appropriate quantitative tools to measure these deficits is not widespread, and evidence for active sensory training remains limited.

In recent years, robotic therapy has been proposed as an effective approach for upper limb rehabilitation. Nevertheless, recent studies with large samples have failed to demonstrate the superiority of robotic treatment over traditional methods regarding the recovery of upper limb motor functions. These studies primarily focus on motor aspects of stroke recovery, often neglecting sensory and cognitive aspects of rehabilitation, whether robotic or conventional.

Actually, there is limited evidence supporting the superiority of robotic approaches over conventional rehabilitation in recovering cognitive deficits and sensitivity. Additionally, it remains unclear whether cognitive and/or sensory deficits impact motor outcomes differently when using robotic versus conventional approaches.

To address this, the SCORES (Sensory and Cognitive Outcomes of Robotic Exercises in Stroke) study is a multicenter randomized controlled study investigating the effects of robotic rehabilitation on cognitive and sensory deficits in stroke survivors. It aims to compare robotic and conventional rehabilitation approaches regarding cognitive recovery and tactile sensitivity in subacute stroke patients. While some quantitative methods exist to assess absolute perception levels of tactile stimuli, standardized, repeatable, and objectively quantitative methods for assessing localization ability are lacking. Therefore, this study will evaluate how the tactile perceptual abilities of recruited patients evolve during and after a rehabilitation course-whether robotic or conventional-using a specifically developed haptic device that includes a glove with integrated vibrotactile elements. This system aims to objectively define patients' tactile sensitivity through psychophysical evaluations involving the identification and localization of randomized vibrations delivered to the surface of the hand affected by sensorimotor alterations. Specifically, this study will investigate the test-retest reliability, discriminant ability, responsiveness, and clinical validity of the metrics obtained from the haptic glove.

During each experimental session, randomized vibrotactile stimuli will be administered to the recruited patient at different sites on the hand. The patient will be asked to identify and verbally communicate the site of each perceived vibration, as well as the intensity of the vibration itself between the two possible levels.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • a single event, verified by MRI or CT;
  • age between 18 and 85 years;
  • time since stroke within six months;
  • a demographically adjusted total score of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) between 15.5 and 22.23

排除标准

  • behavioural and cognitive disorders and/or reduced compliance that would interfere with active therapy;
  • fixed contraction deformity in the affected limb that would interfere with active therapy (ankylosis, Modified Ashworth Scale = 4);
  • severe deficits in visual acuity.

研究组 & 干预措施

Robotic Rehabilitation

Experimental

Robotic Rehabilitation of the upper limb

干预措施: Robotic rehabilitation (Other)

Conventional Rehabilitation

Active Comparator

Conventional Rehabilitation of the upper limb

干预措施: Conventional rehabilitation (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Number and types of the haptic glove malfunctions that occurred during the study, along with their descriptions (Feasibility evaluation)

时间窗: Baseline; within 2 days after the end of rehabilitation treatment; within 2 days after the end of rehabilitation treatment; 6 months after the end of treatment.

Number and types of the haptic glove malfunctions that occurred during the study, along with their descriptions.

次要结局

  • Number of stimulations provided by the haptic glove and correctly identified in terms of intensity and localization (test-retest reliability)(Baseline; within two day after baseline)
  • Number of stimulations correctly identified in terms of intensity and localization (responsiveness)(Baseline; within 2 days after the end of rehabilitation treatment; 6 months after the end of treatment.)
  • Number of stimulations correctly identified in terms of intensity and localization (clinical validity)(Baseline; within 2 days after the end of rehabilitation treatment.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Evaluation of a Haptic Glove for Assessing Tactile... | 临床试验