NCT00863213
Completed
Phase 4
Study of Ablation Versus antiaRrhythmic Drugs in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation
DrugsAntiarrhythmic drug
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Atrial fibrillation ablation
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Enrollment
- 152
- Locations
- 8
- Primary Endpoint
- Freedom from atrial arrhythmias, lasting more than 24 hours or requiring cardioversion.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 13 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectivity and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation, in comparison to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with refractory, persistent atrial fibrillation.
Investigators
Josep Lluis Mont Girbau
MD Phd
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (more than 7 days, or less than 7 days needing pharmacologic or electric cardioversion)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Hypo or hyperthyroidism
- •Persistent atrial fibrillation lasting more than 1 year or non-defined duration
- •Hypertrophic myocardiopathy
- •Implantable defibrillation or pacemaker implanted
- •Moderate or severe mitral valve disease or mitral prosthetic valve
- •Ejection fraction less than 30%
- •Left atrial anteroposterior diameter more than 50 mm.
- •Previous atrial fibrillation ablation
- •Contraindication to anticoagulation
- •Left atrium thrombus
Arms & Interventions
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Intervention: Atrial fibrillation ablation
Drug therapy
Intervention: Antiarrhythmic drug
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Freedom from atrial arrhythmias, lasting more than 24 hours or requiring cardioversion.
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
Secondary Outcomes
- Freedom from atrial arrhythmias (lasting more than 30 seconds) without antiarrhythmic drugs.(1-year follow-up)
- Decrease in frequency and duration of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter recurrences.(1-year follow-up)
- Decrease in atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter related hospital admissions(1-year follow-up)
- Improve in quality of life measured with standard questionary for Atrial Fibrillation: AF-QoL.(1-year follow-up)
- Change in need of cardioversions(From 3rd to 12th months)
- Need of atrio-ventricular node ablation(1-year follow-up)
- Need of crossover to the other arm of the study (only when primary end point has been reached)(1-year follow-up)
- Need of a new intervention or ablation during blanking period(Until 3rd month)
- Detection of asymptomatic episodes by Reveal XT(1-year follow-up)
- Presence of any complications in the acute phase or during follow-up(1-year follow-up)
Study Sites (8)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Surgical Ablation Versus No Surgical Ablation for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Mitral Valve SurgeryAtrial FibrillationMitral Valve InsufficiencyMitral Valve StenosisNCT00903370Annetine Gelijns260
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Ablation to Prevent Disease Progression of AF-induced Atrial Cardiomyopathy in Women and MenFibrillation, AtrialAtrial CardiomyopathyNCT06200311University Medical Center Groningen604
Unknown
Not Applicable
Catheter Ablation Compared With Pharmacological Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation (CAPTAF Trial)Atrial FibrillationQuality of LifeNCT02294955Uppsala University Hospital152
Completed
Phase 4
A Comparison of Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy and Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationParoxysmal Atrial FibrillationNCT00540787Biosense Webster, Inc.112
Completed
Phase 3
First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (RAAFT-3)Atrial FibrillationNCT04037397University of Pennsylvania25