Heavy Lifting Strength Training in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors
- Conditions
- Cancer of Head and Neck
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Exercise Intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT04554667
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Brief Summary
The LIFTING trial will examine the feasibility and safety of a heavy lifting strength training (HLST) program in head and neck cancer survivors (HNCS) at least 1 years post surgical neck dissection. The trial will determine whether this training style is safe and feasible in HNCS. Physical and psychosocial changes will also be reported.
- Detailed Description
RATIONALE Despite improvements in treatments, HNCS still endure numerous acute and chronic side effects. Strength training has been shown to manage some of these side effects but most interventions have involved light-to-moderate resistance training programs. HLST may produce better outcomes but it is unknown if such a weight training program is feasible and safe for HNCS.
OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this proposed study is to examine the feasibility and safety of a HLST program in HNCS at least 1 year post-surgical neck dissection.
METHODS This single arm feasibility study will recruit 15-20 HNCS to complete the HLST program 2 times per week. The primary feasibility outcomes will include the eligibility rate (with reasons for ineligibility), recruitment rate (with reasons for refusal), 1 repetition maximum testing rate (with reasons for not completing the test), program adherence (including attendance, dose modifications, and progression), and follow-up assessment rate (with reasons for drop out). The primary efficacy outcome will be strength gains from baseline. Secondary efficacy outcomes will include physical functioning, quality of life, fear of cancer recurrence, pain, body composition, anxiety, fatigue, stress, shoulder mobility, self-esteem, sleep, and motivation to engage in a HLST program.
SIGNIFICANCE Weight training is an effective intervention in HNCS but the optimal weight training prescription is unknown. If heavy weight training is deemed safe and feasible in HNCS, it can be compared to light-to-moderate load weight training to determine if it is a better prescription for improving outcomes that are important to HNCS.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 9
- previously diagnosed with any subtype and stage of head and neck cancer
- at least one year post surgical neck dissection for head and neck cancer and showing full shoulder range of motion or recovery of the spinal accessory nerve
- adults ages 18 and older
- no unmanaged medical conditions, alcohol, and drug abuse
- approved for a heavy lifting strength training program by the treating surgeon and a certified exercise physiologist
- ability to understand and communicate in English
- having comorbidities or uncontrolled medical conditions that their referred clinicians indicate as inappropriate to participate in exercise
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Exercise Intervention Exercise Intervention Single exercise arm
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recruitment Rate Over 12 weeks Recruitment rate (with reasons for refusal).
Recruitment minimum: 15 participants Recruitment maximum: 20 participants Higher number= better and more dataProgram Adherence Over 12 weeks Program adherence minimum: 80% Program adherence maximum: 100% Higher score= better adherence
Muscular Strength Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Change in muscular strength from baseline to postintervention with be assessed using maximal strength tests.
Minimum: none Maximum: none Higher score= better strength
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Self-Esteem Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Changes in level of self-esteem assessed using Rosenberg Self-Esteem (RSE) scale
Minimum: 10 Maximum: 40 Higher score= better self-esteemWeight Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using a digital scale without shoes.
Minimum weight: none Maximum weight: none Higher weight: typically worse, but depends on other factors (ie. height, muscle mass, overall health status)Fear of cancer recurrence Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI)
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 36 Higher score= worse fear of cancer recurrenceStress Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 56 Higher score=worse perceived stressMotivation Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Questions based on the theory of planned behaviour
Minimum: 7 Maximum: 35 Higher score= better motivationCancer Symptom Burden Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r)
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 100 Higher score= worse cancer symptomsPost Traumatic Growth after cancer Changes from baseline to 12 weeks How cancer has changed an individual's life will be assessed using the Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI)
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 105 Higher score= better (positive) post traumatic growth transformationHeight Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using standing height without shoes.
Minimum height: none Maximum height: none Taller: not specifically better or worsePhysical functioning Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) and maximum strength tests.
Minimum: 40 Maximum: 100 Higher score= worse impairmentWaist to hip ratio (body composition) Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using waist to hip ratio (WHR) measure.
Minimum WHR: none Maximum WHR: none Higher score WHR= worse body compositionAnxiety Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Minimum: 20 Maximum: 80 Higher score= worse anxietyFatigue Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) questionnaire
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 52 Higher score=worse fatigueShoulder Mobility Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Changes in shoulder mobility
Minimum: 150 degrees (18-50 years); 130 degrees (over 50 years) Maximum: none Higher score= better mobilitySleep Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Changes in sleep patterns assessed using the insomnia severity index (ISI)
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 28 Higher score= worse insomniaCancer specific quality of life Changes from baseline to 12 weeks Assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H\&N Symptom Index)
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 40 Higher score= worse head and neck cancer symptoms
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Alberta
🇨🇦Edmonton, Alberta, Canada