跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04517942
NCT04517942已完成不适用

An Evaluation of the Peer-delivered EVERYbody Project: Eating Disorder Risk Factor Reduction for College Students

Western Washington University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 141 人开始时间: 2017年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
141
试验地点
1
主要终点
Eating disorder symptoms

研究概览

简要总结

The second trial of the EVERYbody Project explored the efficacy of the inclusive body image intervention when delivered by college peer leaders. The peer-facilitated EVERYbody Project was compared to a video and expressive writing comparison intervention through one-month follow-up.

详细描述

The initial trial of the EVERYbody Project established that professional leaders could deliver a universal, inclusive body image program for college students, with benefit above and beyond a waitlist control condition. The second trial of the EVERYbody Project aimed to further evaluate the intervention using a more disseminable facilitator model: trained college student peer leaders. It also utilized a more rigorous comparison condition, where peer leaders conducted the two-session EVERYbody Project program or a time-matched video and expressive writing intervention. College students within a university in the Pacific Northwest United States were invited to participate in programming (universal intervention target). Quantitative assessment included a comparison of changes in eating disorder risk factor outcomes across randomization conditions at pre- and post-intervention and one-month follow-up. Feasibility and acceptability explored the impact of the peer delivered program within universal college student audiences.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Factorial
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Current college student enrolled at institution where research was taking place

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

EVERYbody Project: Peer facilitator version

Experimental

This dissonance-based body image program was created from focus group feedback (Ciao, Ohls, & Pringle, 2017) and piloted in an initial randomized-controlled trial. Based on the Body Project (Stice et al., 2006), it retains key dissonance activities while adapting exercises to have a more inclusive focus (e.g., expanding the gender focus, exploring diversity characteristics within appearance ideals, adjusting activities to be inclusive of diversity).

Around 10% of the original EVERYbody Project manual was modified to create the Peer Facilitator version for the current trial. Changes focused on adding individual exercises to draw out the critique of diversity in cultural ideals, refining prompts to be more suitable for peer facilitation, and flagging sections of the manual for more "expert" peer facilitation.

Peer facilitators received 16 hours of training on the EVERYbody Project manual and peer facilitation guidelines (e.g., group management, handling problems, etc.).

干预措施: EVERYbody Project (Behavioral)

Video + Expressive Writing group

Active Comparator

Video + expressive writing groups were facilitated by a peer leader following a detailed script. This intervention was designed as an active but low-dissonance comparison condition. Participants viewed two separate documentary movies related to gender and/or appearance-related pressures (one during each session): (1) The Illusionists (2015 ), and (2) The Mask You Live In (2015). Participants engaged in a brief (10 minute) reflective writing exercise after each film. In order to keep dissonance low, participants were told that their reflections would not be shared with anyone and they were not turned in.

Peer facilitators received brief (1 hour) training on the video group manual.

干预措施: Video + Expressive Writing (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Eating disorder symptoms

时间窗: Assessed at baseline (Survey 1), post-intervention (Survey 2), and one-month follow-up (Survey 3)

Eating disorder symptoms were assessed with the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDEQ; Fairburn \& Beglin, 1994). The Global score of the EDEQ was used in this study (average across all 28 items).

Body dissatisfaction

时间窗: Assessed at baseline (Survey 1), post-intervention (Survey 2), and one-month follow-up (Survey 3)

The Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale (SDBPS; Berscheid, Walster, \& Bohrnstedt, 1973) assessed satisfaction and dissatisfaction with nine parts of the body that are commonly endorsed as concerning (e.g., stomach, thighs, hips). The average score was used in this study (average across all 9 items).

Internalized cultural appearance norms

时间窗: Assessed at baseline (Survey 1), following intervention Session 1 (Survey 1.B), post-intervention (Survey 2), and one-month follow-up (Survey 3)

The two Internalization subscales of the Sociocultural Attitudes Toward Appearance Questionnaire-4 (SATAQ-4; Schaefer et al., 2015) assess internalized cultural messages surrounding appearance and attractiveness. The two internalization subscales were combined for this study (average across all 10 items), following prior research by Kilpela et al. (2016). This survey was assessed at all outcome time points (Survey 1, 2, and 3), plus midway through the intervention (following Session 1 of the program).

次要结局

  • Negative affect(Assessed at baseline (Survey 1), post-intervention (Survey 2), and one-month follow-up (Survey 3))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Anna Ciao

Associate Professor of Psychology

Western Washington University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验