Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00297661
NCT00297661
Completed
Phase 4

Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: SIRTAX Trial

University of Bern1 site in 1 country1,012 target enrollmentApril 2003

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Coronary Heart Disease
Sponsor
University of Bern
Enrollment
1012
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Major adverse cardiac events at nine months (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
19 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Context: Sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, reduce the risk of restenosis. It is unclear whether there are differences in safety and efficacy between the two types of drug-eluting stents.

Objective: To determine differences in safety and efficacy between sirolimus and paclitaxel eluting stents.

Detailed Description

Design: Randomized controlled, observer-blind trial comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents Patients: 1012 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The two groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2003
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
19 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with either stable angina or an acute coronary syndrome were eligible to participate if they had at least one lesion with stenosis of at least 50 percent in a vessel with a reference diameter between 2.25 and 4.00 mm that was suitable for stent implantation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Allergy to antiplatelet drugs, heparin, stainless steel, contrast agents, sirolimus, or paclitaxel; participation in another coronary-device study; and terminal illness.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Major adverse cardiac events at nine months (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Clinical: Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target-vessel revascularization, and target-vessel failure (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization)
  • Angiographic: In-segment late luminal loss

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials