TCTR20190222006已完成不适用
AIMS65 score compared with Glasgow-Blatchford risk score and Rockall score for predicting outcomes of upper GI bleeding : A prospective single center study.
none0 个研究点目标入组 300 人开始时间: 2019年2月22日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 300
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •The inclusion criteria were patients aged > 18 years who were admit to the Department of Internal Medicine with signs and symptoms of UGIH inclusion criteria: melena, coffee ground vomitus, hematemesis and/or hematochezia.
排除标准
- •Exclusion criteria included:
- •(1) patients who did not undergo esophagogastroduodenoscope (EGD) within 72 hours after onset of admission
- •(2) patients with history of UGIH in part 3 months
- •(3) patients diagnosed non-UGIH after the diagnostic workup
- •(4) patients with incomplete data required for calculation of either of three scores
- •(5) patients who had received treatment at other institutions
- •(6) patients who declined to provide informed consent for the study.
研究者
相似试验
招募中
不适用
Prognostic Value of AIMS65 Score to Predict Outcome in Patients With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingPatients With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingNCT05773339Sohag University100
招募中
不适用
Association of blood level of two blood tests (serum CRP AND serum albumin)with aggressive nature of urinary bladder cancer.CTRI/2020/05/025296Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
招募中
不适用
A prospective validation study of the Glasgow-Blatchford scoreACTRN12617000654358Royal Adelaide Hospital400
招募中
不适用
The Sheffield Scoring System, a prognostic tool for the requirement for endoscopic haemostatic intervention in paediatric upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a tertiary hospital in Khon Kaen, ThailandChilderen aged 0-18 years who present with upper gastrointestinal bleedingchilderen, upper gastrointestinal bleedingTCTR20240605003Khon Kaen University100
尚未招募
Unknown
Study For Severity Assessment Of Acute Pancreatitis Comparing BISAP And APACHE-II ScoringCTRI/2024/06/068370ONE