Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05079412
NCT05079412CompletedNot Applicable

Does Non-Invasive Ventilation Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NIV-NAVA) Improve Diaphragmatic Function in Preterm Infants?

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Evaluation of the diaphragmatic Thickness (in millimetre) in neonates on each arm (NIV-NAVA and NIPPV)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) provides un-synchronized positive pressure and considered to be superior to nCPAP in preventing extubation failure. Recently, Non-Invasive Ventilation Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NIV-NAVA) was introduced to NICU. NAVA is a ventilation mode that uses the electrical activity of the patient's diaphragm (Edi-signal) to guide both timing and magnitude of the support. However, it is unknown whether NIV-NAVA is superior to NIPPV in preventing extubation failure and preventing BPD.

Hence, the investigators aim to compare the effect of NIPPV and NIV-NAVA on diaphragm function in premature infants with RDS or evolving BPD. Our hypothesis is that infants treated with NIV-NAVA will have improved diaphragmatic function and lung scoring.

Detailed Description

STUDY POPULATION Premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome who are admitted to Mount Sinai NICU and are supported with NIPPV or NIV-NAVA.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Infants that were born at 22 0/7 to 29 6/7 weeks gestation and admitted to the NICU at Mount Sinai Health System.
  2. Infants that are on NIPPV or NIV-NAVA respiratory support for at least 24 hours at the time of enrolment.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Infants with congenital anomalies.
  2. Infants with known genetic disorder.
  3. Infants with known lung malformation or diaphragm dysfunction.
  4. Infants of whom parents declined consent.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
2 Weeks to 4 Weeks (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Infants with congenital anomalies.
  • Infants with known genetic disorder.
  • Infants with known lung malformation or diaphragm dysfunction.
  • Infants of whom parents declined consent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evaluation of the diaphragmatic Thickness (in millimetre) in neonates on each arm (NIV-NAVA and NIPPV)

Time Frame: 1 YEAR

Chest ultrasound will be performed to eligible (consented) patient after being on the respiratory support (NIV-NAVA vs NIPPV) for at least 24 hours. diaphragmatic Thickness (in millimetre) will be measured. Investigator interpreting the scans will be blind to patients type of respiratory support or clinical status.

Evaluation of the diaphragmatic excursion (in millimetre) in neonates on each arm (NIV-NAVA and NIPPV)

Time Frame: 1 YEAR

Chest ultrasound will be performed to eligible (consented) patient after being on the respiratory support (NIV-NAVA vs NIPPV) for at least 24 hours. diaphragmatic Excursion (in millimetre) will be measured. Investigator interpreting the scans will be blind to patients type of respiratory support or clinical status.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Lung ultrasound score for infants in NIV-NAVA group vs NIPPV group(1 YEAR)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Adel Mohamed

Principal Investigator

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Does NIV-NAVA Improve Diaphragmatic... | Clinical Trial