NCT00389870CompletedPhase 3
A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal Cancer Therapy (PICCOLO)]
University of Leeds33 sites in 1 country1,198 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2006Last updated:
Conditions
Drugs
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- University of Leeds
- Enrollment
- 1,198
- Locations
- 33
- Primary Endpoint
- Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks
Study Overview
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as irinotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Cyclosporine may help irinotecan work better by making tumor cells more sensitive to the drug. Monoclonal antibodies, such as panitumumab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Panitumumab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether irinotecan is more effective when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying irinotecan to compare how well it works when given with or without panitumumab or cyclosporine in treating patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer that did not respond to fluorouracil.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) vs Ir with cyclosporine (IrC) in patients with fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer.
- Compare the efficacy of single-agent Ir vs Ir with panitumumab (IrP) in these patients.
Secondary
- Correlate the toxicity of Ir and/or IrC with genetic variability in the enzymes involved in irinotecan hydrochloride's disposition pathway.
- Compare IrC to Ir and its metabolites (SN38; SN38G), in terms of pharmacokinetic profile.
- Correlate the benefit of IrP with tumor expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or its known down-stream molecules as a predictive measure.
- Correlate IrP efficacy or toxicity (specifically the severity of skin rash) with somatic alterations in the EGFR gene and/or with germline variability in related genes.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 120 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- •Diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma meeting 1 of the following criteria:
- •Previous or current histologically confirmed primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and clinical/radiological evidence of advanced or metastatic disease
- •Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma with clinical or radiological evidence of colorectal primary tumor
- •Unidimensionally measurable disease
- •Disease progression during or after prior fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin therapy and/or with or without bevacizumab
- •Adjuvant therapy and/or prior therapy for advanced disease allowed
- •No clinical or radiological evidence of pleural effusion or ascites causing ≥ grade 2 dyspnea
- •No clinical or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction
- •No known CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis
- •PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- •WHO performance status 0-2
- •Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
- •Hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dL
- •WBC > 3,000/mm³
- •Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
- •Glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min OR EDTA clearance > 60 mL/min
- •Bilirubin < 1.46 mg/dL
- •Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
- •AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN
- •No history of Gilbert's syndrome
- •Not pregnant or nursing
- •Negative pregnancy test
- •Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after completion of study treatment
- •Capable of completing quality of life questionnaires
- •No prior anaphylactic allergic reaction to cetuximab
- •No other prior or concurrent cancer (excluding nonmelanomatous skin cancer)
- •No unresolved bowel obstruction, uncontrolled gastrointestinal infection, chronic enteropathy (e.g., Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), or chronic diarrhea (≥ 4 stools per day) of any cause
- •No recent history of seizures
- •No clinical or radiological evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis,
- •Capable of reliable oral self-medication
- •No other condition that would make the patient unsuitable for participation in this study
- •PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- •See Disease Characteristics
- •No major thoracic or abdominal surgery within the past 4 weeks
- •No systemic anticancer therapy within the past 3 weeks
- •No prior irinotecan hydrochloride
- •No grapefruit juice within 3 days before and after each chemotherapy treatment
- •No experimental drug therapy or antibody therapy, other than cetuximab, within the past 6 weeks
- •No systemic chemotherapy and/or cetuximab within the past 3 weeks
- •No antifungals or antibiotics within the past 5 days
- •No ongoing requirement for cyclosporine or any other medication including, but not limited to, the following:
- •Ketoconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole
- •Erythromycin, clarithromycin, norfloxacin
- •Diltiazem hydrochloride, verapamil, amiodarone hydrochloride
- •Fluvoxamine
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Proportion of patients treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (Ir) alone vs Ir and cyclosporine (IrC) who are progression-free at 12 weeks
Overall survival of patients treated with Ir vs Ir and panitumumab (IrP) and no prior cetuximab
Secondary Outcomes
- Proportion of patients free from treatment failure at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
- Overall survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
- Nurse-assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality, diarrhea ≥ grade 3 at 12 weeks) in patients treated with Ir vs IrC
- Progression-free at 12 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
- Nurse assessed toxicity (all-cause mortality) in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and no prior cetuximab
- Progression-free survival in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
- Best response at 1 year in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
- Patient-assessed symptom/quality of life/acceptability scores at 12 and 24 weeks in patients treated with Ir vs IrP and prior cetuximab
Investigators
Study Sites (33)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Fluorouracil and Leucovorin and/or Levamisole After Surgery In Treating Patients With Dukes' B Or Dukes' C Colon CancerColorectal CancerNCT00425152NSABP Foundation Inc2,151
Completed
Phase 3
Liver Infusions of Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Dukes' A, Dukes' B, or Dukes' C Colon Cancer Undergoing SurgeryColorectal CancerNCT00427310NSABP Foundation Inc1,158
Completed
Phase 1
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid TumorsUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol SpecificNCT00005791Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Terminated
Phase 2
Irinotecan in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Inoperable Thyroid CancerHead and Neck CancerNCT00100828Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins6
Terminated
Phase 3
Trial Testing Ftorafur (UFT) Associated With Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Rectal AdenocarcinomaStage II/IIIT3 or T4 (Only Anal Extension) Rectal CancerN0-2M0Rectal CancerNCT00207831Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest219