MedPath

Stretching in Children and Adolescents With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
Interventions
Other: Static stretching
Other: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching
Registration Number
NCT04570358
Lead Sponsor
University of Graz
Brief Summary

The primary aim of this study is to gain knowledge about both the effects of a single bout of static and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and the effects of 8-week static and PNF stretching training on the calf muscle-tendon properties in children with spastic cerebral palsy (SCP). Furthermore, the effects on joint and muscle function, stretch reflexes, gait, and self-reported gait function and functional performance are examined to receive a comprehensive picture of potential changes.

Further aims of this study are to identify which stretching technique might be more efficient by comparing the effects of both stretching interventions, and to gain information about the influence of foot flexibility on the stretch achieved by the spastic gastrocnemius muscle.

Detailed Description

Background: Spastic cerebral palsy (SCP) is a non-progressive neuro-muscular disorder in children resulting from an injury in the central nervous system. Individuals with SCP present with impairments such as hyperreflexia, demonstrate impaired motor control and muscle growth. Manual stretching is an important approach in the physical therapy of individuals with SCP used to increase muscle extensibility and length, decrease muscle stiffness, and to improve functional abilities. However, there are only a few studies that have examined its acute and long-term effects in children with SCP and it is still not clear, if it may lead to the expected changes, and which method might be the most-effective one. Besides static stretching, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching has been used to aid the rehabilitation of, for example, stroke patients by either facilitating muscle elongation and/or improving muscle strength. Positive effects were found (e.g., increased dorsiflexion, improved gait function, altered tendon properties), which are also clinically relevant for individuals with SCP. However, there is no information about the impact of PNF in this population.

Aims: The primary aim of this study is to gain knowledge about both the effects of a single bout of static and PNF stretching and the effects of 8-week static and PNF stretching training on the calf muscle-tendon properties in children with SCP. Furthermore, the effects on joint and muscle function, stretch reflexes, gait, and self-reported gait function and functional performance are examined to receive a comprehensive picture of potential changes. Further aims of this study are to identify which stretching technique might be more efficient by comparing the effects of both stretching interventions, and to gain information about the influence of foot flexibility on the stretch achieved by the spastic gastrocnemius muscle-tendon unit.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial with a cross-over design will be performed. Prior to the measurements, a familiarization session takes place and both groups will further be examined in three separate measurement sessions. Based on a power calculation and in order to account for possible dropouts, 30 individuals with SCP (age range: 6 to 15 years) will be recruited. The participants will be randomly allocated to either the static stretching or PNF stretching intervention after the familiarization session. Passive muscle-tendon morphological properties will be examined. A manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessment will be performed to test for differences in the reflex responses. Information about the lengthening behavior of the tissues throughout the dorsiflexion rotations will also be collected by use of ultrasound. Isometric muscle strength and the active torque-angle relationship will be investigated using an isokinetic dynamometer. To assess the gait pattern of the children, a gait analysis will be performed by use of an 8-camera motion capture system. In addition, we will examine the participants' gait function and functional performance by use of the Gait Outcomes Assessment List questionnaire.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  • spastic cerebral palsy
  • ambulatory children and adolescents
  • ability to accept and follow verbal instructions
  • no severe contracture of the calf muscles (max. ankle dorsiflexion >= 0°, with knees extended)
  • classified as GMFCS level I, II, or III
  • aged between 6 and 5 years
  • willingness to participate
Exclusion Criteria
  • others than spastic forms of cerebral palsy
  • severe mental retardation
  • fixed muscle contractures (ankle equinus deformity = max. ankle dorsiflexion <= 0°, with knees extended)
  • oral anti-spastic and/or muscle relaxation medication in the last 6 months
  • orthopaedic surgery and/or Botulinum toxin type A application in the last 12 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Static stretchingStatic stretchingAn 8-week home-based static stretching training for the calf muscles will be performed by group A. Altogether, 10 stretches are performed per leg 4 times a week.
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretchingProprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretchingAfter group A has finished the 8-week static stretching training, group B starts with the 8-week home-based proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching training. Altogether, 10 stretches are performed per leg 4 times a week.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in spasticity/stretch hyperreflexiabaseline (T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Stretch reflex responses assessed by a manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessment

Change in active moment-angle relationshipbaseline (T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Maximum isometric voluntary contractions at specific ankle joint angles (isokinetic dynamometry)

Change in joint range of motionbaseline (T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Ankle joint range of motion (maximal plantarflexion - maximal dorsiflexion)

Change in mechano-morphological muscle-tendon propertiesbaseline (T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Gastrocnemius medialis muscle morphology, muscle stiffness, tendon-aponeurosis length and stiffness, muscle-tendon unit length and stiffness, elongations of the tissues

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in gait characteristicsfamiliarisation session (T0, 1-week before T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Gait kinematics of the hip, knee, and ankle joints, gait kinetics (3D motion capture)

Change in maximal isometric muscle strengthbaseline (T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Maximal isometric torque production (isokinetic dynamometry)

Change in self-reported gait, mobility, and functional performancefamiliarisation session (T0, 1-week before T1), post-measurement (T2, 8 weeks), follow-up measurement (T3, 16 weeks)

Gait Outcomes Assessment List (GOAL) questionnaire

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Institute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health; University of Graz

🇦🇹

Graz, Austria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath