Placenta Accreta Spectrum Management: Uterine Preservation Using JSICA Technique - Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
- Conditions
- Placenta Accreta
- Interventions
- Procedure: Standard HysterectomyProcedure: Jakarta Surgical Uterine Conservation (JSICA) Technique
- Registration Number
- NCT05871645
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
- Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to present the Jakarta Surgical Uterine Conservation (JSICA) technique and its perioperative outcomes in Placenta Accreta Spectrum patients. Participants are all patients undergoing standard hysterectomy or the Jakarta Surgical Uterine Conservation (JSICA) technique. Researchers will compare both groups to see if there are any differences in the perioperative outcomes.
- Detailed Description
This study uses data from Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital's Placenta Accreta Case Register. This register includes all patients with a confirmed placenta accreta spectrum diagnosis. Data collected includes demographic characteristics, risk factors, surgery characteristics, and perioperative outcomes. In this study, researchers would like to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of the JSICA technique in comparison to a standard hysterectomy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 323
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Standard Hysterectomy Standard Hysterectomy Surgery to remove the uterus Jakarta Surgical Uterine Conservation (JSICA) technique Jakarta Surgical Uterine Conservation (JSICA) Technique Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital's novel uterine preservation technique based on standard procedure
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intraoperative bleeding Perioperative Intraoperative bleeding in this study was measured by the amount of blood loss (cc) and classified into \< 1.000 cc, 1.000-1.500 cc, and \> 1.500 cc. .
Operation duration Perioperative The operation duration was the time interval from skin incision to closure (hours) and classified into \< 3 hours and \> 3 hours.
Rate of Intraoperative complications Intraoperative Rate of intraoperative complications were identified by the documentation of injury to adjacent structures (bladder or ureter) or a need for transfusion.
Number of Patients Admitted to ICU 24 hours ICU admission was identified by the documentation of number of patients' admission to the ICU
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of Intraoperative complications in JSICA compared to hysterectomy Perioperative Rate of intraoperative complications were identified by the documentation of injury to adjacent structures (bladder or ureter) or a need for transfusion in comparison of JSICA to hysterectomy
Number of Patients Admitted to ICU in JSICA compared to hysterectomy 24 hours ICU admission was identified by the documentation of number of patients' admission to the ICU in comparison of JSICA to hysterectomy
Intraoperative Bleeding in JSICA compared to hysterectomy Perioperative Intraoperative bleeding in this study was measured by the amount of blood loss (cc) and classified into \< 1.000 cc, 1.000-1.500 cc, and \> 1.500 cc in comparison of JSICA to hysterectomy
Operation duration in JSICA compared to hysterectomy Perioperative The operation duration was the time interval from skin incision to closure (hours) and classified into \< 3 hours and \> 3 hours in comparison of JSICA to hysterectomy
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Maternal Fetal Medicine Division, Obstetric Gynecology Department Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital
🇮🇩Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia