A comparative study in the effectiveness of laproscopy guided tap block versus USG guided ESP block in laproscopic upper GI surgeries
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1.comparative analysis of the analgesic effectiveness of Laproscopic TAP blocks versus USG-guided ESP blocks
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares the effectiveness of two regional anesthesia techniques—laparoscopic-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block—in managing postoperative pain following upper abdominal laparoscopic surgeries (e.g., cholecystectomy, bariatric procedures).
A total of 50 adult patients were randomized into two groups (25 each). The study evaluates parameters such as pain relief, duration of analgesia, time to first analgesic request, and postoperative drug consumption, along with patient satisfaction, recovery milestones, and quality of life.
The aim is to identify which technique offers better pain control, reduces opioid use, and supports faster recovery, thereby optimizing postoperative care in line with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients who are over 18 years of Age.
- •Patients who have consented to undergo a Surgical and mode of analgesia in lap .
- •General or Gastrointestinal Surgery(Cholecystectomy , hiatal hernia repairs , bariatric surgery ) and who were possessing full Mental Capacity of the events at the Institution.
- •Patients who have been discharged from the institution after undergoing a Surgical procedure at the institution.
- •Patients who have followed up with the Doctors of the institution after the Surgical procedure.
排除标准
- •Patients who are not Over 18 years of Age.
- •Patients who have not consented to undergo the Procedure at the Institution or did not possess full Mental Capacity of the events.
- •3.High risk patients , i.e risk of local bleeding , contaminated procedures,unstable physiology.
- •Patients who have not been discharged.
结局指标
主要结局
1.comparative analysis of the analgesic effectiveness of Laproscopic TAP blocks versus USG-guided ESP blocks
时间窗: 1.on data collection completion | 2. 6 hours and 12 hours post op | 3. 24 hours in Immediate post op period | 4 . After completion of sample size
3.Investigate to reduce the need for opioid analgesics in the postoperative setting.
时间窗: 1.on data collection completion | 2. 6 hours and 12 hours post op | 3. 24 hours in Immediate post op period | 4 . After completion of sample size
2.Collect patient-reported outcomes to gauge the perceived effectiveness of both techniques in managing postoperative pain.
时间窗: 1.on data collection completion | 2. 6 hours and 12 hours post op | 3. 24 hours in Immediate post op period | 4 . After completion of sample size
4.Use findings from the study to propose an optimized, evidence-based analgesia plan for the postoperative period
时间窗: 1.on data collection completion | 2. 6 hours and 12 hours post op | 3. 24 hours in Immediate post op period | 4 . After completion of sample size
次要结局
- 3.Investigate the potential for both techniques to reduce the need for opioid analgesics in the postoperative setting.(4.Use findings from the study to propose an optimized, evidence-based analgesia plan for the postoperative period that maximizes pain relief while minimizing opioid consumption.)