Quadriceps Tendon Autograft, Tendon-Bone Versus All-Soft-Tissue for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Patient-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

It is well known that ACL injuries are among the most common sports and knee injuries. As a result, ACL reconstruction is at the forefront both in terms of research and development and advancements in technique. One focus of research is graft choice and the risks and benefits associated with each. There are multiple valid graft choices including bone-patellar tendon-bone, hamstring tendon, quadriceps tendon, quadriceps tendon-patellar bone, and allograft. Graft choice is often patient centered and based on both patient and surgeon considerations such as age, sex, activity level, surgeon preference and graft associated complications.

The present study seeks to compare the intraoperative, immediate perioperative, intermediate and long-term outcomes between tendon-bone and all-soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction in adolescent patients. The investigators will analyze data on operative time, cost, complications, recovery of strength and range of motion, return to sports rates, patient reported outcomes, and failure rates. With this proposal the investigators hope to determine if there is a superior graft technique in this population. Both graft types are validated in the literature separately as options for ACL reconstruction in this age group. There has been no clinical research comparing the two graft types, and therefore no consensus is made among surgeons on whether to use tendon-bone or all-soft-tissue when it comes to the QT autograft. A secondary aim of this study is to obtain patient reported outcomes throughout the post-operative period to determine if the patient experience is different between the two graft types. This data may be used in guiding a surgeon's decision on which type to use with their patients.