Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2023/11/059976
CTRI/2023/11/059976Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

A study on comparing the accuracy of conventional predictor model versus artificial intelligence in predicting difficult intubation in anaesthesia

Shahana Muneer1 site in 1 country793 target enrollmentStarted: November 21, 2023Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
793
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
to assess the accuracy of conventional predictor model and artificial intelligence in predicting difficult airway

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the accuracy of conventional predictor model of difficult airway prediction (including parameters like BMI , neck circumference, thyromental distance, interincisor gap, mallampatti classification, age  and head and neck movements) and artificial intelligence model using random forest classifier. Using a Macintosh blade of size 3 or 4 , laryngoscopy will be done and vocal cord is graded according to cormack lehane grading. Grades 1 and 2 are considered as easy and 3 and 4 as difficult airways.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 80.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA 1,2 and 3.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Developmental anomalies which may affect airway assessment
  • Patients with airway malformations, midline neck swellings, face trauma or other gross external head and neck deformities
  • Psychiatric patients who are unable to follow commands.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

to assess the accuracy of conventional predictor model and artificial intelligence in predicting difficult airway

Time Frame: 18 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • To compare conventional model & artificial intelligence in prediction of difficult intubation(18 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Shahana Muneer
Sponsor Class
Other [self]

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials