A study on comparing the accuracy of conventional predictor model versus artificial intelligence in predicting difficult intubation in anaesthesia
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 793
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- to assess the accuracy of conventional predictor model and artificial intelligence in predicting difficult airway
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the accuracy of conventional predictor model of difficult airway prediction (including parameters like BMI , neck circumference, thyromental distance, interincisor gap, mallampatti classification, age and head and neck movements) and artificial intelligence model using random forest classifier. Using a Macintosh blade of size 3 or 4 , laryngoscopy will be done and vocal cord is graded according to cormack lehane grading. Grades 1 and 2 are considered as easy and 3 and 4 as difficult airways.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18.00 Year(s) to 80.00 Year(s) (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA 1,2 and 3.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Developmental anomalies which may affect airway assessment
- •Patients with airway malformations, midline neck swellings, face trauma or other gross external head and neck deformities
- •Psychiatric patients who are unable to follow commands.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
to assess the accuracy of conventional predictor model and artificial intelligence in predicting difficult airway
Time Frame: 18 months
Secondary Outcomes
- To compare conventional model & artificial intelligence in prediction of difficult intubation(18 months)
