MedPath

Radio-opaque Contrast Agents for Liver Cancer Targeting With KIM During Radiation Therapy

Recruiting
Conditions
Liver Neoplasm
Registration Number
NCT05169177
Lead Sponsor
University of Sydney
Brief Summary

This observational study will investigate the properties of image files standardly collected during radiation therapy treatment in a cross-section of liver cancer patients who received stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) after trans-catheter arterial chemo emobilisation (TACE). Specifically, it will determine whether the radio-opaque contrast agents in the image files can be detected by tumour-tracking software (KIM).

Detailed Description

* Sites will collect image files from the Cancer Radiation Therapy Systems and the medical records of eligible participants. For patient who do not have implanted markers, research personnel (a radiation oncologist, medical physicist or radiation therapist) will manually outline the visible contrast mass. This outline is considered the 'ground truth' of the location of the contrast mass. To ensure its accuracy, the ground truth contrast mass location will be checked by research personnel from another study site.

* Image and ground truth data collected from 80% of participants will be used by University of Sydney researchers to develop the KIM algorithm to detect and track the radio-opaque contrast agents with sufficient robustness to provide justification for the prospective use of KIM as a real-time image guided radiation therapy tool for liver cancer patients.

* The developed KIM software will be applied by site Medical Physicist(s) to the treatment imaging data from the remaining 20% of participants the images. Tumour positions produced by KIM will be compared with a 'ground truth' manual delineation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Received or will receive stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) treatment for liver cancer at a participating site.
  • Received a radio-opaque contrast agent (e.g. Lipiodol™ or DC Bead LUMI™) that is visible on the radiation treatment planning CT scan
  • The radio-opaque contrast agent mass is or will be within the x-ray imaging field of view during the CBCT scan and any planned intra-fraction imaging. Note that there is no requirement of the distance between the contrast agent mass and the treated tumour as the goal of the study is the contrast agent mass tracking.
  • Provides written informed consent (prospectively recruited) or meets criteria for waiving of the requirement for consent (retrospectively recruited)
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Minimum image dataset is not available
  • Image dataset is not in a compatible format
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Average difference between software and ground truth measure2 weeks

Average difference (mm) of location of contrast mass detection on CBCT and treatment images by KIM software compared to the ground truth in each of the horizontal and vertical directions.

Standard deviation of difference between software and ground truth measure2 weeks

Standard deviation difference (mm) of location of contrast mass detection on CBCT and treatment images by KIM software compared to the ground truth in each of the horizontal and vertical directions.

Proportion of images that have contrast mass detection by software2 weeks

Proportion of images in which kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring software detects contrast agent mass on CBCT and intra-treatment images

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Modelling of patient or treatment features that contributed to the success or failure of the KIM method2 weeks

Using the KIM success rate (primary hypothesis) and patient CT imaging features (contrast agent density, size, shape and location, patient size etc) a generalised linear model, or appropriate alternative, will be used to identity univariate and multivariate patient or treatment features that contributed to the success or failure of the KIM method. Selected features will be identified and developed into a model. If the model predicts the likelihood of KIM success in at least 85% of the patients then the study will be deemed to have achieved the hypothesis.

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Princess Alexandra Hospital

🇦🇺

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Westmead Hospital

🇦🇺

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

The Austin Hospital

🇦🇺

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital

🇦🇺

Waratah, New South Wales, Australia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath