Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2021/08/035988
CTRI/2021/08/035988Active, not recruitingPhase 3

Comparative Evaluation Of Two Different Maintaenance Protocols In Type-2 Diabetic Patients Undergoing Non- Surgical Periodontal Therapy

A0 sites40 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Active, not recruiting
Sponsor
A
Enrollment
40
Study OverviewEligibility CriteriaInvestigatorsRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •INCLUSION CRITERIA:7,20,21
  • •Type 2 diabetic patients (HbA1c < 7%) with generalized chronic periodontitis according to classification by AAP by Armitage.
  • •Subjects who are on oral hypo-glycemic agents or insulin injections and prescribed diet in combination or separately. They should be diabetic for >1 year and on the same type and dose of diabetic medication for past 6 months.
  • •Patients who are in good physical condition and do not have any major illness or serious medical condition or transmissible disease.
  • •Patients willing to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •EXCLUSION CRITERIA:7,8,19,22,23
  • •History of systemic antibiotic usage over the past 4 months
  • •Pregnant or lactating women
  • •Non-surgical periodontal treatment within past 6 months
  • •Use of immunosuppressive medications
  • •Subjects with intake of supplemental ascorbic acid
  • •Subjects with history of prolonged drug use that interfere with coagulation system, e.g. Coumarin derivatives
  • •History of severe cardiovascular, hematological, renal, hepatic and immunological disorders
  • •Patients who are smokers and alcoholics
  • •Patient not willing to give informed consent

Investigators

Sponsor
A

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing two different Vibration frequencies on the rate of orthodontic Tooth Movement
CTRI/2021/01/030823Dr Sakshi Sachdeva
Completed
Phase 3
Comparative evaluation of the effect of two different fluid therapy regimen on the bowel motility return after surgeryIleus.K-56.0Paralytic ileus
IRCT2014090711398N7Research Deputy of Iran University of Medical Sciences100
Completed
Phase 3
The Comparison between the effects of Two treatment of Postcerebrovascular Accident (CVA) Motor AphasiaAphasia.Dysphasia and aphasia
IRCT2014052417814N1Vice Chancellor of Research, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences48
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different single shade tooth coloured restorative material
CTRI/2022/04/041716DRSUWIDHI RANKA
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different doses of labetalol for changes in hemodynamics during intubation in abdominal surgeries.
CTRI/2021/09/036263Department of Anesthesia SMS medical college