Covid-19 Predictors: Safety of Gynecological Oncology Patients Undergoing Systemic Cancer Therapy
- Conditions
- Telemedicine
- Interventions
- Device: PPG and PROM
- Registration Number
- NCT05043220
- Lead Sponsor
- Technical University of Munich
- Brief Summary
We designed a monocenter prospective cohort study using PROM via app and remote monitoring via pho-toplethysmography (PPG). The application of these technologies enables an early detection of infections and therefore initiation of medical interventions. The study is conducted as feasibility analysis; primary endpoints are adherence (according to wearing time) and technical robustness.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- gynecological cancer
- indication for systemic cancer therapy
- patients who are legally competent and able to understand and follow instructions of the study staff
- present informed consent
- no use if internet or applications
- persons who are in a dependency or employment relationship with the study center
- positive proof of COVID-19
- affection of the external auditory canal
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Telemedicine PPG and PROM Telemonitoring via PPG (photoplethysmography) and PROM (patient reported outcome monitoring) via app
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compliance 3 months Compliance is defined as wearing time of the in-ear-sensor.
robustness of the ppg-signal 3 months number and duration of the ppg-signal transmitted
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number of contacts and hospitalization rates 3 months definition via comparison of alerts and resulting contacts and hospitalization rates with clinical data
infections 3 months detection of infesctions via suspected ppg-signal transmitted or PRO-data. This results in blood test zu verify acute infections.
number of correct- and false-positive alerts 3 months definition via comparison of alerts with clinical data
health-related costs 3 months cost-effectiveness analysis
OS; PFS 3 months time between study inclusion and death; time between study inclusion and proven increasing tumor mass (number of days)
therapy modifications 3 months dose-reductions (%), postponing of therapy cycles (time in days between actual and plannend date), therapy discontinuation
effect on quality of life 3 months change in minimum 9 points in the EORTC QLQ-C30-questionnaire is evaluated as significant change. In questions 1-28: 28-112 points can be achieved: higher scores are associated with a worse outcome. In questions 29-30:2-14 points can be achieved: higher scores are associated with a better outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Klinikum rechts der Isar, Frauenklinik, Technische Universität München
🇩🇪Munich, Germany