Bypass Versus Endovascular Procedure in Long Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery in the Claudicant
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Lesion; Femoral
- Sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Enrollment
- 290
- Locations
- 16
- Primary Endpoint
- Primary patency rate at 2 year follow-up.
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 7 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
In lower limb peripheral arterial disease, the stage of intermittent claudication has a prevalence of more than 5% over the age of 60, and affects patients who are often still active. Frequent anatomical lesions are strictures / occlusions of the superficial femoral artery.
There is a current low level of evidence for the treatment modalities of long lesions (15-25 cm) of the superficial femoral artery and in particular no clinical trial comparing the femoro-popliteal bypass to the endovascular procedure whose patency in retrospective series. appears lower than that of surgery but nevertheless appears in the European recommendations for first-line treatment, with the absence of a dedicated trial being highlighted.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patient
- •Effective contraception for the duration of research for fertile women of childbearing age
- •Unilateral Rutherford 2 or 3 symptomatic Lower Extremity Artery Disease (LEAD) arteritic patient with a lesion of the superficial femoral artery Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C or D between 15 and 25 cm
- •Patient eligible for bypass surgery and endovascular procedure
- •No alteration of the upstream flow (iliac flow preserved or restored)
- •Patient with at least one patent artery below the knee
- •Patient informed and having signed the information and consent form to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
- •Known pregnancy or breastfeeding
- •Iliac flow altered upstream
- •History of surgery or stent on the affected superficial femoral artery
- •Concomitant bacteremia (positive blood cultures in the 7 days preceding the procedure)
- •Known intolerance to antiaggregants or heparin
- •Contraindication to the endovascular procedure (severe renal failure contraindicating the injection of contrast product despite prior hydration, known severe allergy to iodinated contrast product \[unless the center chooses to use carbon dioxide injection\]) or bypass surgery (cardiovascular, respiratory or other comorbidities, contraindicating general anesthesia, local contraindications for bypass: skin lesion at the operative site)
- •No affiliation to a social security regime or to another social protection regime
- •Patient deprived of liberty or under legal protection (guardianship, trusteeship)
- •Inability, according to the investigator, to understand or refusal to sign the informed consent to participate in the study (non-French speaking patient, cognitive disorders)
- •Ongoing participation in another research protocol Participation in non-interventional research is authorized
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Primary patency rate at 2 year follow-up.
Time Frame: 2 year
Primary patency is defined by the presence of satisfactory flow in the superior femoral artery or bypass
Secondary Outcomes
- Clinical improvement according to the Rutherford classification (clinical stages of ischemia) at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months(1, 6, 12 and 24 months)
- The increase in the systolic pressure index at discharge from hospital, then at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months (<0.75,> 0.75)(1, 6, 12 and 24 months)
- The treatment burden measured by the Treatment Burden Questionnaire at 6 months(6 months)
- Primary patency rate at 1 year follow-up.(1 year)
- Secondary patency rate at 1 and 2 years follow-up.(1 and 2 years)
- Improvement of the walking perimeter at 1 and 2 years (<200m,> 200m, unlimited)(1 and 2 years)
- The quality of life measured by the Vascu-Qol 6 to 2 years(2 years)
- Number of participants with adverse events as assessed by hematoma, redo surgery or vascular infection at 2 years(During 2 years)