Efficacy of Self-Expanding Nitinol S.M.A.R.T CONTROL Stent Versus Life Stent For The Atherosclerotic Femoro-Popliteal Arterial Disease

Phase 4

• Conditions: Atherosclerosis; Peripheral Arterial Disease
• Interventions: Device: LifeStent; Device: S.M.A.R.T CONTROL Stent

• Registration Number: NCT01653600
• Lead Sponsor: Korea University Guro Hospital

Brief Summary

The nitinol stent has proven superior primary patency than balloon angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions. Recent stent design improvements focus on decreasing stent fracture rates which can negatively impact patency rates by rearranging strut alignment. In the literature, however, prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial for comparison of stent fracture and primary patency between different nitinol stents has never been performed except one study; SMART versus Luminexx stent named SuperSL trial. LifeStent is similar to S.M.A.R.T. stent in the design consisted of the peak-to-valley connected with S-shaped bridge but is different in lesser bridge (4 bridge vs. 6 bridge), large cell size on stent ends, and larger cell size than S.M.A.R.T. On the other hand, Recent meta-analysis has shown that the efficaty of cilostazol in the atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesion was proven. However, still specific data regarding a variety of antiplatelet regimen in implanted femoropopliteal lesion are limited. Upto date, in the literature, never has never been performed the clinical trial for optimal duration of cilostazol use in the patient undergone stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesion. Thus, The purpose of our study is to examine and compare Primary patency and stent fracture between different two-nitinol stents (S.M.A.R.T. CONTROL versus Lifestent) in femoropopliteal arterial lesion and to examine and compare the optimal duration of cilostazol use.

Detailed Description

Five randomized, controlled trials failed to demonstrate any benefit of a stainless-steel stent over angioplasty alone. The nitinol stent has proven superior primary patency than balloon angioplasty in superficial femoral artery lesions. Recent stent design improvements focus on decreasing stent fracture rates which can negatively impact patency rates by rearranging strut alignment. In vitro, Stefan et al. reported difference in stent design might play a major role in the appearance of stent strut fracture related to restenosis and reocclusion. Also, several retrospective or registry clinical studies reported stent fractures were associated with a higher risk of in-stent restenosis and reocclusion. In the literature, however, prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial for comparison of stent fracture and primary patency between different nitinol stents has never been performed except one study; SMART versus Luminexx stent named SuperSL trial (lesion length between 5-22 cm). Furthermore, in the Asian population, the study of this type have never been performed. LifeStent is similar to S.M.A.R.T. stent in the design consisted of the peak-to-valley connected with S-shaped bridge but is different in lesser bridge (4 bridge vs. 6 bridge), large cell size on stent ends, and larger cell size than S.M.A.R.T. On the other hand, 2011 ESC guideline recommended that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine for at least one month is recommended after infrainguinal bare-metal-stent implantation. Recent meta-analysis has shown that the efficaty of cilostazol in the atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesion was proven. However, still specific data regarding a variety of antiplatelet regimen in implanted femoropopliteal lesion are limited. Upto date, in the literature, never has never been performed the clinical trial for optimal duration of cilostazol use in the patient undergone stent implantation for femoropopliteal lesion. Thus, The purpose of our study is to examine and compare Primary patency and stent fracture between different two-nitinol stents (S.M.A.R.T. CONTROL versus Lifestent) in femoropopliteal arterial lesion and to examine and compare the optimal duration of cilostazol use (6 month versus 12 month)

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2012-04-09
• Status Verified: 2012-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2012-07-27
• Last Update Submitted: 2012-07-27
• Study First Posted: 2012-07-31
• Last Update Posted: 2012-07-31
• Study Start: 2012-09
• Primary Completion: 2014-08
• Study Completion: 2015-08

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 346

Inclusion Criteria

• Clinical criteria

  1. Age 20 years of older
  2. Symptomatic peripheral-artery disease with (Rutherford 2 - 6); moderate to severe claudication (Rutherford 2-3), chronic critical limb ischemia with pain while was at rest (Rutherford 4), or with ischemic ulcers (Rutherford 5-6)
  3. Patients with signed informed consent

• Anatomical criteria

  1. Target lesion length < 3 cm by angiographic estimation
  2. Stenosis of >50% or occlusive atherosclerotic lesion of the ipsilateral femoropopliteal artery
  3. Patent (≤50% stenosis) ipsilateral iliac artery or concomitantly treatable ipsilateral iliac lesions (≤30% residual stenosis),
  4. At least one patent (less than 50% stenosed) tibioperoneal run-off vessel.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

1. Disagree with written informed consent
2. Major bleeding history within prior 2 months
3. Known hypersensitivy or contraindication to any of the following medication: heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel or contrast agent
4. Acute limb ischemia
5. Previous bypass surgery or stenting of the ipsilateral femoropopliteal artery
6. Untreated inflow disease of the ipsilateral pelvic arteries (more than 50% stenosis or occlusion)
7. Patients that major amputation ("above the ankle" amputation) has been done, is planned or required
8. Patients with life expectancy <1 year due to comorbidity
9. end-staged renal failure on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
10. Age > 85 years

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
LifeStent	LifeStent	same to SMART CONTROL Stent
SMART CONTROL Stent	S.M.A.R.T CONTROL Stent	study design is 2x2 randomization design. First, before randomization, stratification will be performed according to lesion length 15cm criteria at web-based computerized program. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 manner according to different two (SMART versus LifeStent) stents. And then, patients received aspirin and clopidogrel during one month. After one month from index procedure, clopidogrel will be stopped and changed into cilostazol. Patients were randomized to receive cilostazol 100mg bid either 11 month duration or 5 month duration in separate groups of SMART stent group and LifeStent group. Randomization procedure will be performed using a web-based program

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The rate of binary restenosis	one year	binary restenosis is defined as the restenosis of at least 50 percent of the luminal diameter in the treated segment at 12 months after intervention, when determined by catheter angiography.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
stent fracture rate, clinical outcomes, angiographic outcomes, ankle-brachial index	1 year	1. Stent fracture rate; 2. Limb salvage free of above-the-ankle amputation; 3. Sustained clinical improvement rate; 4. Repeated target lesion revascularization rate; 5. Repeated target extremity revascularization rate; 6. Total re-occlusion rate; 7. Anigoraphic variables (Late loss, % restenosis); 8. Ankle-brachial index; 9. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); 10. The incidence of the stent geographic miss during stent deployment; 11. binary restenosis rate according to cilostazol use duration upto 12 month and 6 month

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Korea University Guro Hospital; 🇰🇷 Seoul, Korea, Republic of