跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00946205
NCT00946205已完成不适用

Laparoscopic Posterior Rectopexy Without Mesh vs. Laparoscopic Anterior Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse - a Prospective, Double-blind, Randomised Study

Aarhus University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 75 人开始时间: 2006年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
75
试验地点
2
主要终点
The severity of obstructive defecation as graded by Wexner's incontinence- and constipation-score and Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the present prospective, double-blind, randomized study is to study whether laparoscopic anterior mesh rectopexy is as good as laparoscopic posterior rectopexy with respect to obstructive defecation afterwards.

详细描述

Full-thickness rectal prolapse is defined as a "falling down" of the rectum so that it is outside the body. Rectal prolapse can only be treated by surgery.

The choice of procedure depends on the patient's general condition and is based on a clinical judgment. Usually, elderly, high-risk patients are treated by perineal procedures. All other patients are offered an abdominal rectopexy using open or laparoscopic techniques. The general principle for all abdominal procedures is to induce adhesions between the mobilised, elevated rectum and the presacral fascia.

At least 30%-60% develop long-term complications: Obstructive defecation, which may be related to peroperative trauma to rectums innervation. Sparing of the lateral stalks during the rectal mobilisation results in lower frequency of obstructive defecation afterwards, but also higher recurrence rate.

A nerve-sparing laparoscopic technique for rectal prolapse has been developed in Belgium: Laparoscopic anterior mesh rectopexy.

After this procedure, the rate of obstructed defecations afterwards has been reported to less than 10%, that is, much lower than observed after other procedures.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse for whom the department otherwise would offer abdominal rectopexy according to the department's recommendation. That is, patient being fit for an abdominal rectopexy procedure.

排除标准

  • Age below 18 years.
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Patients who do not speak or read Danish.
  • Dementia or other psychiatric disease, i.e., inability to give informed consent.
  • Recurrence of rectal prolapse.

结局指标

主要结局

The severity of obstructive defecation as graded by Wexner's incontinence- and constipation-score and Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score

时间窗: 1 year postoperatively

次要结局

  • Physiologic testing of the ano-rectum: Anorectal manometry,anal sensibility,anal ultrasound, colonic transit.(1 year postoperatively)

研究者

发起方
Aarhus University Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lene H. Iversen

MD, DMSci, PhD

Aarhus University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验