Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07741500
NCT07741500Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Body Image, Identity Development, and Social Media Use Among Youth With Visual Impairment: A Single Case Intervention Study

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven2 sites in 1 country15 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2027Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
15
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
State body satisfaction

Study Overview

Brief Summary

1. Introduction

This 3-week single case intervention study is funded by the Horizon Europe Research Program and is part of the VIPPSTAR project (Project 101156763 - VIPPSTAR "Visually Impaired children and adolescents: bridging the gap with Personalized Prevention Strategies, Tools, Approaches, and Resources). Within this project, the Belgian consortium will focus on the development of body image in relation to the social media use of children (10-11 years old) and adolescents (12-18 years old) with visual impairment (VI). This intervention study builds upon the insights done in earlier studies within the project, a focus group study and daily diary study. In the intervention study, children and adolescents with visual impairment will complete digital body image exercises through the first version of VIPPSTAR app. It is important to note that the data collection for this particular study will be limited to Flanders, Belgium, and will not extend to the other countries involved in the VIPPSTAR project. Furthermore, the ethical approval obtained for this study is specifically for collecting data from Flemish participants only, ensuring compliance with local ethical guidelines and regulations.

Detailed Description

2. Background and Rationale VI is a term used to describe a partial or complete loss of vision that cannot be corrected with glasses or contact lenses. It can range from mild visual difficulty to complete blindness. It can be caused by either congenital or acquired eye maldevelopments (PVI: peripheral VI) or disruptions in central visual pathways (CVI: cerebral VI). A recent meta-analysis highlights a striking global prevalence of VI in those under 20. Most PVIs stem from genetic issues, like hereditary retinal dystrophies. In contrast, CVI involves damage to post-geniculate visual pathways due to factors like birth hypoxic-ischemic damage, and, as such, is very frequent in children with cerebral palsy. Up to 70% of individuals with genetic syndromes (such as Down Syndrome and other neurodevelopmental disorders) have VI. For this study in particular, children and adolescents with a moderate CVI and children and adolescents with a moderate visual impairment according to the definitions of the World Health Organizations Report on Vision, who have functional impairments that require adjustments, tools and/or support at school will be included. Children and adolescents whose vision can be corrected with glasses and/or contact lenses do not fit the requirement of this study. VI significantly impacts psychological, educational, and social performance, adding mental burden and affecting individuals' quality of life (QoL). In this regard, children with VI experience worse QoL than population-based samples, body image development and mental and social well-being.

Regarding body image development, children and adolescents with VI face unique challenges in developing their body image compared to their unaffected peers. Body image development is a crucial developmental task during childhood, marked by significant biological (e.g., development of secondary sex characteristics), cognitive (e.g., increased self-reflection skills), and psychosocial changes (e.g., heightened importance of peer relationships), directing children's focus toward their evolving physical bodies. Children and adolescents with VI are at a heightened risk of developing negative body image, influenced by various challenges across different contexts (i.e., personal, interpersonal including peer and parental relationships, and societal including media portrayal of appearance), contributing to feelings of differentiation from their unaffected peers. Scholars have advocated to more systematically explore and identify experiences of youth with VI that can nourish and/or harm their healthy body image development. Building on the identification of these experiences, amongst others, the VIPPSTAR project aims to offer the first holistic framework for a life-long enhancement of health, well-being, and autonomy of children and adolescents with VI of different degrees of severity. The VIPPSTAR project will do this through building an online platform, which will contain an avatar that will assist adolescents with VI in several elements of their life; nutrition, physical activity and body image. The current study will solely use the body image module of the platform.

While different factors contribute to body image development, one potentially profound socialization factor is social media. Social media play a dominant role in the lives of children and adolescents, especially visual platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat and YouTube. For people of all ages and with different types of VI, social media are known to play a big role in their lives. However, since the visual nature of these platforms, users are encouraged to present themselves in a physically attractive way. The idealized appearance images on these platforms typically reflect narrow beauty standards. Exposure to such idealized bodies on social media can lead to internalization of these ideals and adopting them as personal beliefs.

As adolescence marks period with a high risk for the development body image concerns, scholars have noted this developmental period as a key time for intervention. Furthermore, digital and/or mobile interventions have high potential for success for adolescents. Previous research additionally showed that having social media literacy can be a protective factor for body image. Consequently, the present intervention study will examine the effectiveness of doing weekly exercises on body image states in VI children and adolescents. This study specifically focuses on children and adolescents (10-18 years old old) since they are avid social media users. Furthermore, the development of body-related beliefs and behaviors are especially salient during this developmental stage. Additionally, interventions targeting body image and social media literacy have previously been shown to have a small effect in adolescents without a visual impairment. The primary study objective is therefore to explore if doing exercises about body image and social media literacy related to body image can improve the body image of children and adolescents with VI. Conducting this intervention study might lead to a more comprehensive approach of the development of these children and adolescents.

3. Study Design and Objective 3.1 Study objective

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
10 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Children with (C)VI
  • Participants should be aged between 10-18 years old
  • Participants should be able to understand Dutch sufficiently
  • Participants should be cognitively able to comprehend the questions
  • A completed ICF by the parent if the participant is under 18 years of age and a completed assent form by the participant

Exclusion Criteria

  • Intellectual disability of such severity that they are unable to respond to the questions (as indicated by parents)
  • Non-Dutch Speaking (as indicated by parents)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

State body satisfaction

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

Today, I felt satisfied with my appearance. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true.

State self-esteem

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

Today, I have high self-esteem. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true

State body surveillance

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

Item 1: Today, I compared how I look with how other people look. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true. Item 2: Throughout the day, I thought about how I look many times. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true.

State functionality appreciation

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

Item 1: I appreciate my body for what it is capable of doing. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true. Item 2: I am grateful that my body enables me to engage in activities that I enjoy or find important. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true. Item 3: I respect my body for the functions it performs. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true.

Social media use

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

Did you use social media today? 1=Yes, 2=No

State social media physical appearance comparisons

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

Item 1: When using social media, I compare my physical appearance to the physical appearance of others. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true Item 2: When using social media, I compare how Ia m dressed to how other people are dressed. 1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true Item 3: When using social media, I sometimes compare my figure to the figures of other people.1=not true at all, 2=not true, 3=sometimes not true, sometimes true, 4=true, 5=completely true

State cognitive social media literacy

Time Frame: 8 weeks, asked 16 times

If you used social media today and saw posts/stories of other people, how critically did you think about the appearance of the people in those posts/stories? For example, did you think about if something was edited, if this person looked realistic, which effects the post could have on others, how much this person wanted to get likes and comments on their post. 1=Not critically at all, 2=not critically, 3=neutral, 4=critically, 5=very critically

State affective social media literacy

Time Frame: 8 weeks, measured 16 times

Item 1: Did you have a negative feeling due to using social media today? For example feeling jealous or angry about your body and appearance by the things you saw or did on social media. 1=Yes (follow up question) 2=no (no question) Item 2: When you did not feel good about yourself, did you do anything to change that and make yourself feel better? For example closing social media, unfollowing people, looking at profiles that give you a positive feeling about yourself and your appearance, or talking to someone about how you feel. 1=Not critically at all, 2=not critically, 3=neutral, 4=critically, 5=very critically

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials