Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04007822
NCT04007822
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Evaluation of the 'Pain Navigator Tool' During Physiotherapy Consultations in Patients With Chronic Low-back Pain: a Service Evaluation Trial.

Glasgow Caledonian University1 site in 1 countryJuly 1, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Chronic Low-back Pain
Sponsor
Glasgow Caledonian University
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Semi-Structured Interview
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study explores the experience of physiotherapists and patients using the Pain Navigator Tool during outpatient musculoskeletal consultations.

Detailed Description

Chronic pain is the largest cause of disability globally and affects up to 28 million people in the UK alone. Nearly half of those who experienced chronic pain in Europe reported receiving insufficient pain management. Conventional treatments commonly used in physiotherapy continue to show only moderate effects in pain management. A potential avenue to improve the global effect of treatments may lie in exploring non-specific treatment moderators such as the therapeutic alliance (TA). Findings suggest that it is linked with engagement in rehabilitation and is a strong predictor of treatment outcomes and adherence. This study aims to evaluate and compare the quality of practice with or without the Pain Navigator Tool (PNT). Understanding the impact of the PNT on therapeutic alliance would open an avenue to improve chronic pain management, reduce healthcare-related expenses and increase the quality of life in the population studied. In addition, exploring the experience of the physiotherapists with using the PNT will provide an in-depth understanding of its use and applicability in similar settings. The aims of this study are to: 1. To evaluate and compare the quality of practice with or without the PNT in patients with chronic low-back. 2. To collect preliminary data on the usability and practicality of the PNT for physiotherapists.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1, 2019
End Date
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participant aged \>18 years
  • Low-back pain for more than three months
  • Able to read and speak English to a level allowing satisfactory completion of the study procedures
  • Initial appointment with a participating physiotherapist
  • Physiotherapist:
  • 2 years of experience in treating patients with chronic pain
  • Currently working in an MSK outpatient clinic
  • Able to read and speak English to a level allowing satisfactory completion of the study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Low-back pain is not the primary reason for physiotherapy appointment
  • Return appointment with physiotherapist

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Semi-Structured Interview

Time Frame: 4 weeks

Semi-structured interviews with the participating physiotherapists will explore the experience using the PNT.

Change in the Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale

Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks and at 1 month follow-up

The HC-PAIRS is selected to assess the pain-related attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists. It is a validated tool with adequate psychometric properties and has already been used in the selected population. It measures attitudes and beliefs on a scale of 13 to 91 with higher scores on this scale indicating stronger beliefs that LBP validates disability.

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

Time Frame: 4 weeks

The PSEQ is selected to capture the patients' levels of confidence in carrying out day-to-day tasks despite the presence of pain. It assesses the confidence of people with any type of chronic pain in activity despite pain. It covers enjoying activities, household daily activities, social life, coping in general, work, leisure activities, coping with pain without medication, accomplishing goals, living a normal lifestyle, and becoming more active, all 'despite pain'. Each is rated on a 7 point scale from 0 = not at all confident to 6 = completely confident. The total score, ranging from 0 to 60, is calculated by adding the scores for each item. Higher scores reflect stronger self-efficacy beliefs.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in the Pain Understanding and Confidence Questionnaire(0 weeks, 4 weeks and at 1 month follow-up)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials