Comparison clinical outcomes between Ipsilateral and Alternate-lateral Biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

Phase 3

Completed

• Conditions: Patient who had diagnosed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging identified that lumbar spinal stenosis two to three adjacent level; Spinal stenosis

• Registration Number: TCTR20240625001
• Lead Sponsor: Research Faculty of Medicine

Brief Summary

This study suggests that both ipsilateral and alternate-lateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis yield similar clinical outcomes and complication rates.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Completion: 2024-05-21
• Study Start: 2024-06-25
• Last Update Posted: 19 August 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

1.Age > 18 years old
2.Two to three adjacent levels in lumbar spinal stenosis patients
3.Low grade spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis
4.Failed conservative for at least 3 months
5.Moderate to severe stenosis

Exclusion Criteria

1.Lumbar spinal stenosis patients who have indicated for decompression with fusion and/or instrumentation
1.1Clinical or Radiographic instability
1.2High grade spondylolisthesis
1.3Revision decompression
1.4Facet joint resection >50%
2.Lumbar spinal stenosis patients who have causing from spinal metastasis, spinal tumor, or spinal infection
3.Double crush syndrome
4.Involuntary patients due to concern about risks of surgery, complications after surgery, financial problems, and including of subject withdrawal

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified