Comparison clinical outcomes between Ipsilateral and Alternate-lateral Biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis

Research Faculty of Medicine0 sites40 target enrollmentJune 25, 2024

ConditionsPatient who had diagnosed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging identified that lumbar spinal stenosis two to three adjacent level Spinal stenosis

Overview

Phase: Phase 3
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Patient who had diagnosed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging identified that lumbar spinal stenosis two to three adjacent level
Sponsor: Research Faculty of Medicine
Enrollment: 40
Status: Completed
Last Updated: last year

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

This study suggests that both ipsilateral and alternate-lateral biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis yield similar clinical outcomes and complication rates.

Registry

who.int

Start Date

June 25, 2024

End Date

May 21, 2024

Last Updated

last year

Study Type

Interventional

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Research Faculty of Medicine

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•1\.Age \> 18 years old
•2\.Two to three adjacent levels in lumbar spinal stenosis patients
•3\.Low grade spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis
•4\.Failed conservative for at least 3 months
•5\.Moderate to severe stenosis

Exclusion Criteria

•1\.Lumbar spinal stenosis patients who have indicated for decompression with fusion and/or instrumentation
•1\.1Clinical or Radiographic instability
•1\.2High grade spondylolisthesis
•1\.3Revision decompression
•1\.4Facet joint resection \>50%
•2\.Lumbar spinal stenosis patients who have causing from spinal metastasis, spinal tumor, or spinal infection
•3\.Double crush syndrome
•4\.Involuntary patients due to concern about risks of surgery, complications after surgery, financial problems, and including of subject withdrawal