MedPath

Comparison of Outcomes of Multiple Platforms for Assisted Robotic - Gastrectomy

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Gastrointestinal Cancer
Gastric Neoplasm
Neoplasms
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Diffuse Adenocarcinoma
Stomach Adenocarcinoma
Interventions
Device: Versius® Robotic Surgery System
Device: Hugo™ RAS System
Device: DaVinci® Surgical System
Registration Number
NCT06362070
Lead Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
Brief Summary

The object of this exploratory clinical trial is to evaluate intra and post-operative complications in a population that underwent Robotic Gastrectomy, with multiple platforms:

* DaVinci;

* Hugo;

* Versius.

This study is divided into two phases: in the first phase, gastrectomy will be performed using both the new platforms (Hugo and Versius) and the standard platform (Da Vinci), to evaluate the feasibility of the surgical procedure. In the second phase, the three platforms will be compared to evaluate any differences in the learning curve for an upper-GI surgeon, expert in laparoscopic surgery but not with robotic one.

The questions it aims to answer are:

* Are differences (intra-operative, post-operative, oncological, functional, technical, and economic) among the three different platforms observable?

* Are there any differences between the three platforms related to the learning curve for surgeons?

Participants will be enrolled, after obtaining informed consent, in one of the following cohorts:

1. surgery with the daVinci platform;

2. surgery with the Hugo platform;

3. surgery with the Versius platform.

Detailed Description

Gastrectomy for gastric cancer could be performed through open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches. In the last ten years, robotic surgery, performed with Da Vinci® Robotic System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has been introduced and increasingly used globally also in the field of gastric surgery. Indeed, the technological implementation obtained with the use of robotic surgery should guarantee an easier approach to the different phases of gastric surgery, and in particular to the more complex steps relating to the reconstructive phase of the operation.

Recently, after Intuitive patent expiration, two new CE-marked robotic platforms are available in Europe for minimally invasive procedures:

* Versius® Robotic Surgery System, (Cambridge Medical Robotics (CMR) Ltd., Cambridge, UK);

* HugoTM RAS (Medtronic Dublin, Ireland; Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Both platforms are currently used for urological and gynecological procedures, but, no experiences are reported in Literature related to the field of oncological esophago-gastric surgery. In order to provide evidence regarding the new robotic platforms, the COMPAR-G study has been designed to directly compare the Da Vinci® (as standard), Versius® and HugoTM RAS robotic platforms during gastrectomy.

In this regard, this study was proposed, divided into two phases: a first phase for feasibility of surgical procedure with different platforms and the second one to evaluate the learning curve for surgeons.

This second phase will be carried out only in the event of an extension of the rental of the two new platforms for a further period of one year.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
75
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age > 18 and < 80 years
  • Informed consent provided
  • Primary stomach tumor
  • Total or subtotal gastrectomy
  • Tumour stage: T1-4a, any N, M0
  • ASA I-III
  • No BMI limits
  • Upfront surgery or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
  • Extension to esophagectomy
  • Tumor of the esophago-gastric junction (Siwert I-III)
  • Emergency surgery
  • Metastatic patients (stage IV)
  • Patients undergoing preoperative radiotherapy
  • Previous major supramesocolic surgery (excluding cholecystectomy)
  • Other coexisting malignant neoplasms

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Versius® Robotic Surgery SystemVersius® Robotic Surgery SystemRobot-assisted total or subtotal Gastrectomy is carried out through Versius platform. (10 patients enrolled for phase 1 of the study and 15 patients for phase 2)
Hugo™ RAS SystemHugo™ RAS SystemRobot-assisted total or subtotal Gastrectomy is carried out through Hugo platform. (10 patients enrolled for phase 1 of the study and 15 patients for phase 2)
DaVinci® Surgical SystemDaVinci® Surgical SystemRobot-assisted total or subtotal Gastrectomy is carried out through daVinci platform. (10 patients enrolled for phase 1 of the study and 15 patients for phase 2)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of surgical times of the standardized procedures (Phase 2)Intraoperative

Analysis of surgical times (as minutes of the different surgical steps of the standardized procedure).

Conversion rate to open or laparoscopic approach (Phase 1)Intraoperative

Number of procedures in which it is necessary to convert to open or laparoscopic approach, due to surgical and/or oncological needs

Number of participants with major intraoperative complications (Phase 1)Intraoperative

Major complications are considered according to the GASTRODATA definition (Unintentional intraoperative damage to major vessels and/or organs requiring reconstruction or resection. Intraoperative bleeding requiring urgent treatment. Unforeseen medical conditions that interrupt or change the planned procedure) and according to Clavien-Dindo Classification (7 grades: I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication.

Analysis of video of surgical procedures (Phase 2)Intraoperative

Evaluation of analysis of video of surgical procedure, as deviations from the standard.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postoperative pain1-5 days postoperative

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 scale for the self-reported rate of pain: zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"

Postoperative hospitalizationFrom the surgery day up to 20 days postoperative

Days of recovery until the date of release

Damage due to positioningIntraoperative

Number of damage due to positioning on the operating bed, during the surgical procedure

Non-Technical Skills Assessment (NTS) demonstrated by members of the surgical team during the intraoperative phase.Intraoperative

Targeted observation with "I.C.A.R.S" checklist (Interpersonal and Cognitive

Assessment for Robotic Surgery) which includes following domains:

Checklist and equipment; Interpersonal skills and Cognitive skills.

Re-admission rate to hospitalizationUp to 90 days postoperative

Number of patients readmitted to the hospital for postoperative complications

Positive Surgical MarginUp to 2 weeks postoperative (during histological analysis)

Positive margin (distal or proximal) at histological examination

Lymph nodes resectionUp to 2 weeks postoperative (during histological analysis)

Number of lymph nodes removed

Possible malfunction of the platformIntraoperative

Note

Estimated Blood LossIntraoperative

Volume of blood loss (ml)

Overall duration of the surgeryIntraoperative

Minutes

Anesthesia, Lymphadenectomy, Gastrectomy (10 different surgical steps)Entrance of patient into operating room until completion of surgery

Minutes

Number of participants with major postoperative complicationsUntil 90 days post surgery

Major complications are considered according to GASTRODATA definition (surgical and/or general) and according to Clavien-Dindo Classification (7 grades: I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb and V): the higher the grade, the higher the severity of the complication

Time taken for platform-related technical stepsFrom the room setting, through surgical procedure until postoperative room restoration for each of expected surgeries

Set up of operating table, Electric connections, Draping, Undraping, Docking, Undocking, Cleaning: time in minutes

Compliance rate to ERAS protocol1-7 days postoperative

Adherence to Enhanced recovery after surgery for gastric cancer (ERAS-GC) protocol, which involves a rapid mobilisation and refeeding of patiens.

Procedure-related costsFrom surgical procedure up to 90 days after surgery

Estimate

Quality of Life EvaluationPostoperaive (follow up at 1 month)

EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients) and EORTC STO-22 questionnaire (for measuring the QOL of patient with gastric cancer)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

General and Upper GI Unit

🇮🇹

Verona, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath