Comparing Water Vapour Thermal Therapy (Rezūm) and TURP
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- Device: RezūmDevice: TURP
- Registration Number
- NCT05762198
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
This is a randomized controlled trial using a non-inferiority design with the subjects randomized 1:1 to either water vapour thermal treatment (REZUM) arm or transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) arm.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 108
- Men 50-80 years
- Refractory urinary retention related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
- On urethral Foley's catheter before treatment
- Prostate size 30-80ml on ultrasound
- Prior prostate operation
- Past or current history of prostate cancer
- Strong suspicion of prostate cancer (e.g. Elevated PSA before urinary retention or abnormal prostate on DRE without workup for prostate cancer)
- Known Urethral stricture / Bladder stone / Hypocontractile bladder
- Known neurological diseases which may affect bladder function (e.g. Parkinsonism, stroke)
- Contraindicated to undergo TURP or REZUM (e.g. not fit for GA/SA, active urinary tract infection, fail to be placed in lithotomy position, uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rezūm Rezūm - TURP TURP -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months after treatment Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention IPSS score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Complication rate 30 days after intervention Assessed by Clavien-Dindo classification
Post-op quality of life score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention Change in quality of life assessed by change in International Prostate QOL score (ranges from 0 to 6, the higher the worse)
Unplanned readmission rate after operation in 30 days 30 days after intervention Percentage of patients with unplanned readmission
Successful trial without catheter (TWOC) within 3 months At 3 months Percentage of patients successfully TWOC
Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention It is assessed by maximum flow rate and post void volume in uroflowmetry
Post-op International Index of Erectile function score Baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after intervention Score 1-5 (the lower the worse)
Hospital stays of procedure On Discharge Measure the hours of in-patient hospitalisation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong