Comparative evaluation of two supraglottic airway devices: intubating laryngeal mask airway ( ILMA) and Ambu Aura I for blind tracheal intubation in adults.
Phase 1
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Anaesthesia
- Registration Number
- PACTR202312917896121
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculty of medicine Ain Shams university
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
1.Age between 18and 60years.
2.American society of anesthesiologists I &II
3.Patients are being scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patient's refusal.
2.Patients with known or predicted difficult airway such as malampati III or IV, mouth opening less than 2.5cm and thyromental distance less than 4 cm.
3.Patients with poor lung compliance, restricted neck movements, oropharyngeal pathology.
4.Patients with risk of gastric aspiration i.e., obesity,hiatal hernia,gastroparesis, pregnancy or trauma.
5.Body mass index > 35 kg/m2
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First attempt success rate for blind endotracheal intubation through the supraglottic airway device.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Total time required for the successful blind endotracheal intubation through the supraglottic device<br>2.Ease of placement of supraglottic airway device as regard<br>a. Number of attempts required for the placement of the supraglottic airway device.<br>b.Time required for the placement of the supraglottic airway device.