跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07264868
NCT07264868招募中不适用

Home Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Bladder Management in Spinal Cord Injury: A Hybrid Implementation-Efficacy Trial

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 21 人开始时间: 2026年5月7日最近更新:
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
21
试验地点
1
主要终点
Safety as assessed by the number of device-related adverse events

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of Injectrode Tibial Nerve Stimulation for bladder function in people with spinal cord injury.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Non-progressive chronic (>1 year) SCI
  • Neurologic level of injury T9 and above
  • Stable over active bladder (OAB) medications (≥3 months)
  • No contraindication to MRI (per MRI Safety Questionnaire)
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Tolerate and be able to evoke toe flexion bilaterally with transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (tTNS) (self or assisted)
  • Pass the tTNS competency checklist to perform or direct performance of tTNS.

排除标准

  • Ongoing/active genitourinary oncologic diagnoses
  • History of other central nervous system disorder (CNS) disorders and/or peripheral neuropathy
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant.
  • Lower Motor Neuron bladder
  • Restorative bladder surgery such as augmentation cystoplasty
  • Botulinum toxin-A injections in the bladder within 6 months of trial enrolment (injection in other sites is allowed)
  • Anticoagulation treatment or prophylaxis
  • Advanced peripheral vascular disease (gangrene, amputation, etc.)
  • History of intolerance to electrical stimulation, particularly of the leg

研究组 & 干预措施

Sham iTNS

Sham Comparator

participants will receive one one sham tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) device for bilateral use.

干预措施: Sham iTNS (Device)

Bilateral iTNS

Experimental

participants will receive one active tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) device and both legs will receive active stimulation

干预措施: iTNS (Device)

Unilateral iTNS

Active Comparator

participants will receive one active and one sham tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) device. The treatment will only be delivered to the leg with the active device.

干预措施: iTNS (Device)

Unilateral iTNS

Active Comparator

participants will receive one active and one sham tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) device. The treatment will only be delivered to the leg with the active device.

干预措施: Sham iTNS (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Safety as assessed by the number of device-related adverse events

时间窗: From baseline to 8 weeks

Adverse events include lead migration and fracture, hematoma, wound infection, delayed healing, nerve injury, and autonomic dysreflexia occurrence during the procedure.

Accuracy as assessed by the percentage of sessions where toe flexion was achieved as recorded in subject logs.

时间窗: From baseline to week 8

Reliability as assessed by the average minimum current (mA) required to elicit toe flexion when testing for accuracy

时间窗: From baseline to week 8

Feasibility of Injectrode procedure as assessed by surveys

时间窗: Week 8

Feasibility to check if reproducible training pathway can enable non-interventional physicians to competently perform Injectrode implantation and removal

Physician acceptability of Injectrode device as assessed by a survey

时间窗: Week 8

The acceptability survey ranges from 0 - 32, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability of the Injectrode device.

Participant acceptability of Injectrode device as assessed by a survey

时间窗: Week 8

The acceptability survey ranges from 0 - 25, with a higher score indicating greater acceptability of the Injectrode device.

Feasibility and acceptability of the Injectrode treatment as assessed by a qualitative interview

时间窗: Week 8

A semi-structured interview will be conducted with participants and providers to explore their perceptions of the Injectrode treatment. Responses will be summarized using qualitative coding and descriptive statistics of themes.

次要结局

  • Number of participants for whom bladder medication dosage reduced(from baseline to 8 weeks)
  • Change in magnitude of dosage of medication(from baseline to 8 weeks)
  • Change in bladder function during urodynamics as assessed by the maximum detrusor pressure (Max Pdet) in cmH20.(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in Bladder function as assessed by the presence or absence of detrusor overactivity (DO) during urodynamics.(baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in bladder capacity (maximum volume in mL) during urodynamics before voiding or discomfort.(baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in the presence or absence of leaks during urodynamics.(baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in bladder sensation during urodynamics as defined by the infused volume (mL) at time of reported first sensation of filling.(baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in bladder sensation during urodynamics as defined by infused volume (mL) at time of reported urgency/ desire to void.(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in bladder sensation during urodynamics as defined by the infused volume (mL) at the time of reported discomfort.(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in detrusor compliance during urodynamics as reported by the change in bladder volume divided by the change in bladder pressure.(baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in the number of incontinence episodes as self-reported in the bladder diary.(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in the frequency of catheterization as self-reported in the bladder diary.(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • Change in the volume of catheterization as self-reported in the bladder diary.(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)

研究者

发起方
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Argyrios Stampas, MD

Associate Professor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

相关资讯