跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03402295
NCT03402295已完成3 期

Superiority of the Triple Combinations of Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VCD) Versus Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (CTD) in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma, Eligible for Transplantation

Grupo de Estudos Multicentricos em Onco-Hematologia0 个研究点目标入组 311 人开始时间: 2009年6月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
311
主要终点
Response rate better than very good partial response after 4 induction cycles

研究概览

简要总结

This study compared two main different induction protocols used to treat myeloma eligible patients in Brazil. VCD against CTD.

详细描述

The primary aim was observe response rate after 4 induction cycles.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • multiple myeloma newly diagnose elegible to autologous transplantation Patients submitted to ctd or vcd Myeloma patients newly diagnose >18yo

排除标准

  • other chemotherapy induction protocol

研究组 & 干预措施

Vcd- (Bortezomibe, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)

Active Comparator

Intervention - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 Intra venous or Subcutaneous once a week (D1-8-15-22) 35days cycle Intervention- Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks orally or Intravenously- total dose per cycle was 160mg.

Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg- intravenously or orally- total dose monthly Total of four cycles

干预措施: Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone (Drug)

Ctd- Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone

Active Comparator

Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg intravenously or orally total dose monthly Intervention- Thalidomide 100-200mg orally- daily dose Intervention -Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks each month- total dose per cycle was 160mg Total of four cycles (cycles of 28 each one)

28 days each cycles- total of four cycles

干预措施: Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Response rate better than very good partial response after 4 induction cycles

时间窗: Response rate after induction phase - at the end of cycle 4- (28 days each cycle)- time frame trough study completion

The primary outcome is to observe the difference response rate between VCD and CTD induction myeloma elegible patient

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Network
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Vania TM Hungria

Assintant Professor of Hematology oncology- Santa Casa de Sao Paulo Medical School

Grupo de Estudos Multicentricos em Onco-Hematologia

相似试验