Superiority of VCD Versus CTD in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma Eligible for Transplantation
Phase 3
Completed
- Conditions
- Multiple MyelomaEffects of Chemotherapy
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03402295
- Brief Summary
This study compared two main different induction protocols used to treat myeloma eligible patients in Brazil. VCD against CTD.
- Detailed Description
The primary aim was observe response rate after 4 induction cycles.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 311
Inclusion Criteria
- multiple myeloma newly diagnose elegible to autologous transplantation Patients submitted to ctd or vcd Myeloma patients newly diagnose >18yo
Exclusion Criteria
- other chemotherapy induction protocol
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ctd- Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg intravenously or orally total dose monthly Intervention- Thalidomide 100-200mg orally- daily dose Intervention -Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks each month- total dose per cycle was 160mg Total of four cycles (cycles of 28 each one) 28 days each cycles- total of four cycles Vcd- (Bortezomibe, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone Intervention - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 Intra venous or Subcutaneous once a week (D1-8-15-22) 35days cycle Intervention- Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks orally or Intravenously- total dose per cycle was 160mg. Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg- intravenously or orally- total dose monthly Total of four cycles
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Response rate better than very good partial response after 4 induction cycles Response rate after induction phase - at the end of cycle 4- (28 days each cycle)- time frame trough study completion The primary outcome is to observe the difference response rate between VCD and CTD induction myeloma elegible patient
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method