A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on the Systemic Effects of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in Patients With Severe Emphysema.
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Emphysema
- Sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Enrollment
- 96
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Endurance time
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy.
Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition.
Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit).
Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves.
Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards.
Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).
Detailed Description
Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy. Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition. Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit). Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves. Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards. Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This study has no major risks for the participating patients. The patients will be exposed to additional exercise capacity and physical activity measurements, 3 additional questionnaires, a CT scan of the quadriceps muscle, a DEXA scan and peripheral blood collection. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients will be exposed to a cardiac MRI or muscle and fat biopsies. Patient can directly benefit from the EBV treatment and the pulmonary rehabilitation program. Indirect benefit might be achieved, because, at a group level the investigators will learn more about this novel treatment for our severe emphysema patients and will be able to further optimize this treatment.
Investigators
Dirk-Jan Slebos
dr. D.J. Slebos
University Medical Center Groningen
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •FEV1 ≤45%pred AND FEV1/FVC \<70%.
- •TLC \>100%pred AND RV\>175%pred.
- •\>50% emphysema destruction @-910HU.
- •\>95% complete major fissure measured by quantitative CT analysis.
- •Non-smoking \>6 months.
- •Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •PaCO2\>8.0 kPa, or PaO2\<6.0kPa.
- •6-minute walk test \<160m.
- •Significant chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, or other infectious lung disease.
- •3 of more hospitalizations due to pulmonary infection within last 12 months before baseline assessments
- •Previous lobectomy, LVRS, or lung transplantation.
- •LVEF\<45% and or RVSP\>50mmHg.
- •Anticoagulant therapy which cannot be weaned off prior to procedure.
- •Patient is significantly immunodeficient.
- •Involved in other pulmonary drug studies within 30 days prior to this study.
- •Pulmonary nodule which requires intervention
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Endurance time
Time Frame: After 6 months
The difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).
Secondary Outcomes
- Pulmonary rehabilitation1(After 6 months)
- Pulmonary rehabilitation2(After 6 months)
- Pulmonary rehabilitation3(After 6 months)
- Patient reported outcomes(After 6 months)
- Cardiopulmonary function(After 8 weeks)
- Metabolism and change in body composition(After 8 weeks)