A Trial on the Effects of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in Severe Emphysema.
- Conditions
- Emphysema
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Pulmonary rehabilitationDevice: EBV treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT03474471
- Lead Sponsor
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Brief Summary
Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy.
Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition.
Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit).
Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves.
Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards.
Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).
- Detailed Description
Rationale: The published clinical trials investigating the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction, showing important patient-related improvements in efficacy, led to the acknowledgement of the treatment in the GOLD-COPD2017 guidelines. Interaction with pulmonary rehabilitation, impact on patient-reported outcomes, physical activity, and extrapulmonary consequences are all topics to gain more insight in. This importantly, to further develop and optimize this innovative and personalized therapy.
Objective: To study in detail the impact and optimal timing of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on exercise physiology and patient-reported outcomes and the impact of the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves (EBV) on cardiopulmonary function, metabolism and changes in body composition.
Study design: This study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 study-arms. Group 1 will first follow a PR program and afterwards undergo the EBV treatment. Group 2 will first undergo the EBV treatment and approximately 8 weeks later will follow a PR program. Group 3 will only undergo the EBV treatment (and can choose to follow a PR program after completing the 6 month FU visit).
Study population: The study population exist of patients with severe emphysema who undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using one-way valves.
Intervention: Most patients will undergo a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and a pulmonary rehabilitation program. One group of patient will under a bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using endobronchial valves and can choose whether they also want to follow a pulmonary rehabilitation program afterwards.
Main study parameters: The main study parameter is the difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This study has no major risks for the participating patients. The patients will be exposed to additional exercise capacity and physical activity measurements, 3 additional questionnaires, a CT scan of the quadriceps muscle, a DEXA scan and peripheral blood collection. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients will be exposed to a cardiac MRI or muscle and fat biopsies. Patient can directly benefit from the EBV treatment and the pulmonary rehabilitation program. Indirect benefit might be achieved, because, at a group level the investigators will learn more about this novel treatment for our severe emphysema patients and will be able to further optimize this treatment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 96
- COPD.
- FEV1 ≤45%pred AND FEV1/FVC <70%.
- TLC >100%pred AND RV>175%pred.
- CAT ≥18.
- >50% emphysema destruction @-910HU.
- >95% complete major fissure measured by quantitative CT analysis.
- Non-smoking >6 months.
- Signed informed consent.
- PaCO2>8.0 kPa, or PaO2<6.0kPa.
- 6-minute walk test <160m.
- Significant chronic bronchitis, bronchiectasis, or other infectious lung disease.
- 3 of more hospitalizations due to pulmonary infection within last 12 months before baseline assessments
- Previous lobectomy, LVRS, or lung transplantation.
- LVEF<45% and or RVSP>50mmHg.
- Anticoagulant therapy which cannot be weaned off prior to procedure.
- Patient is significantly immunodeficient.
- Involved in other pulmonary drug studies within 30 days prior to this study.
- Pulmonary nodule which requires intervention
- Any disease or condition that interferes with completion of initial or follow-up assessments
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group 1:PR-EBV treatment EBV treatment Follow a Pulmonary rehabilitation program PRIOR to the EBV treatment Group 2: EBV treatment-PR Pulmonary rehabilitation Follow a Pulmonary rehabilitation program AFTER the EBV treatment Group 2: EBV treatment-PR EBV treatment Follow a Pulmonary rehabilitation program AFTER the EBV treatment Group 1:PR-EBV treatment Pulmonary rehabilitation Follow a Pulmonary rehabilitation program PRIOR to the EBV treatment Group 3: EBV treatment EBV treatment Only EBV treatment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Endurance time After 6 months The difference in change in endurance time measured by an endurance cycle test between the EBV treatment group and the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction + rehabilitation group (EBV+PR).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pulmonary rehabilitation1 After 6 months • the difference between the EBV treatment group and the EBV+PR group in change in:
* Physical activity measured by accelerometryPulmonary rehabilitation2 After 6 months • the difference between the EBV treatment group and the EBV+PR group in change in:
* Lung function measured by bodyplehtysmographyPulmonary rehabilitation3 After 6 months • the difference between the EBV treatment group and the EBV+PR group in change in:
* Exercise capacity measured by an 6-minute walk distance testPatient reported outcomes After 6 months • the change after EBV treatment in fatigue level measured by the CIS questionnaire.
Cardiopulmonary function After 8 weeks • the change after EBV treatment in RVEDVI as measured with cardiac MRI.
Metabolism and change in body composition After 8 weeks • the change after EBV treatment in fat-free mass index, fat mass, and fat distribution measured by a dexa scan.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
CIRO
🇳🇱Horn, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands