Global Postural Reeducation in Chronic Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Back PainMechanical Low Back Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT01557049
- Lead Sponsor
- Federal University of São Paulo
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program in subjects with chronic low back pain.
- Detailed Description
Approximately 80-85% of individuals will experience low back pain during their lifetime. It is one of the major concerns of current health care. There is evidence for the effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. GPR is a physical therapy method developed in France by Philippe Emmanuel Souchard. Although this method is largely used as form of treatment in most countries, few studies showed its clinical effectiveness in chronic low back pain. This is the first randomized controlled trial, with assessor blind that evaluate the GPR effects in chronic low back pain. All outcome measurements are reliability, validated and sensitivity for statistical changes using the Visual Analogic Scale- VAS (0-10cm), Roland Morris Questionary, SF36 (Quality Life Questionary) and Beck Scale (Depression Symptoms).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 61
- between 18-65 years age,
- low back pain (more than 12 weeks) without legs irradiation,
- pain between 3-8 cm on a visual Analogue scale (0-10cm).
- fibromyalgia,
- pregnancy,
- osteoporosis severe,
- disc herniation,
- patients who had undergone spinal surgical or physiotherapeutic interventions within 3 months prior to baseline assessment.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in pain baseline and two follow-up examinations - after 3 and 6 months from baseline The primary outcome of this study was the measurement of pain assessed with 0-10cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). They were collected at baseline and two follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months from baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in function It was collected at baseline and two follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months from baseline. The secondary outcome included function measured by Roland Morris Questionnaire. It was collected at baseline and two follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months from baseline.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
São Paulo Federal University UNIFESP
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil
São Paulo Federal University UNIFESP🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil