MedPath

Global Postural Reeducation in Chronic Low Back Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Back Pain
Mechanical Low Back Pain
Registration Number
NCT01557049
Lead Sponsor
Federal University of São Paulo
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program in subjects with chronic low back pain.

Detailed Description

Approximately 80-85% of individuals will experience low back pain during their lifetime. It is one of the major concerns of current health care. There is evidence for the effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain. GPR is a physical therapy method developed in France by Philippe Emmanuel Souchard. Although this method is largely used as form of treatment in most countries, few studies showed its clinical effectiveness in chronic low back pain. This is the first randomized controlled trial, with assessor blind that evaluate the GPR effects in chronic low back pain. All outcome measurements are reliability, validated and sensitivity for statistical changes using the Visual Analogic Scale- VAS (0-10cm), Roland Morris Questionary, SF36 (Quality Life Questionary) and Beck Scale (Depression Symptoms).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
61
Inclusion Criteria
  • between 18-65 years age,
  • low back pain (more than 12 weeks) without legs irradiation,
  • pain between 3-8 cm on a visual Analogue scale (0-10cm).
Exclusion Criteria
  • fibromyalgia,
  • pregnancy,
  • osteoporosis severe,
  • disc herniation,
  • patients who had undergone spinal surgical or physiotherapeutic interventions within 3 months prior to baseline assessment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline in painbaseline and two follow-up examinations - after 3 and 6 months from baseline

The primary outcome of this study was the measurement of pain assessed with 0-10cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). They were collected at baseline and two follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months from baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline in functionIt was collected at baseline and two follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months from baseline.

The secondary outcome included function measured by Roland Morris Questionnaire. It was collected at baseline and two follow-up examinations after 3 and 6 months from baseline.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

São Paulo Federal University UNIFESP

🇧🇷

São Paulo, Brazil

São Paulo Federal University UNIFESP
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.