跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01020058
NCT01020058已完成不适用

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Open Mesh Repair in Local Anesthesia to Cost-Optimized Laparoscopic Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia

Uppsala University Hospital4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 384 人开始时间: 2006年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
384
试验地点
4
主要终点
long-term post operative pain

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare the frequency of long-term post operative pain after an open mesh repair ad modum Lichtenstein performed in local anaesthesia to that after an totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair (TEP) for primary inguinal hernia. The investigators will also be assessing the cost for the procedures and hospital care as well as the cost for sick-leave depending on procedure performed. The study hypothesis is that the laparoscopic approach will be associated with less long term post operative pain.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Unilateral inguinal hernia
  • suitable for open mesh repair in local anesthesia as well as laparoscopic repair
  • ASA score I-III
  • informed consent

排除标准

  • ASA score IV (not suitable for TEP)
  • bilateral hernias (laparoscopic repair preferable)
  • recurrent hernia (primary repair affects preferable treatment)
  • large scrotal hernias (not suitable for local anesthesia)
  • earlier open lower abdominal surgery, aside from appendectomy (scarring may be a hindrance for TEP)

结局指标

主要结局

long-term post operative pain

时间窗: 6 wks, 1 year

次要结局

  • cost-effectiveness of the separate procedures(6wks, 1year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ursula Dahlstrand

MD, PhD

Uppsala University Hospital

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验