跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/04/084574
CTRI/2025/04/084574尚未招募1 期

Comparison of ultrasound guided erector spinae block versus paravertebral block for post operative analgesia in breast surgeries

Dr A.Devraajulu1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 62 人开始时间: 2025年4月24日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
62
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the time to first rescue analgesia in both study groups.

研究概览

简要总结

The comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block (ESB) versus paravertebral block (PVB) in breast surgeries, particularly when using levobupivacaine as an analgesic.

Erector Spinae Block (ESB): Involves injecting anesthetic in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle, targeting the dorsal rami of the spinal nerves. It provides analgesia by spreading along the paravertebral space and affecting multiple dermatomes.

-Paravertebral Block (PVB): Involves injecting anesthetic into the paravertebral space, directly affecting the spinal nerves. This can provide more targeted analgesia for specific dermatomes.

Both blocks are effective for postoperative pain relief in breast surgeries. Some studies suggest that PVB may provide better analgesia due to its direct targeting of the intercostal nerves.

Technical Considerations

  • Ultrasound Guidance: Both techniques benefit from ultrasound guidance, improving accuracy and reducing complication rates. ESB is often easier to perform and visualize compared to PVB.

-In breast surgeries using levobupivacaine, both the erector spinae block and paravertebral block provide effective analgesia. The choice between them may depend on the specific surgical procedure, the expertise of the clinician, and patient factors. Further research comparing these techniques directly in large-scale studies would help clarify their relative benefits and optimal usage.

Levobupivacaine is less cardio toxic compared to other analgesia

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA Class 1 or 2 BMI 18 to 35 kg/m2.

排除标准

  • Patient refusal Know Hypersensitivity to LA Chronic systemic illness Bleeding diathesis Infection at local site Pregnancy Patient with spinal deformities.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the time to first rescue analgesia in both study groups.

时间窗: 30mins,60mins,120mins4hrs,8hrs,12hrs,24hrs,48hrs.

次要结局

  • To compare the total tramadol consumption for 1st 24hrs.(VAS score at 1hr,4hrs,12hrs,24hrs.)

研究者

发起方
Dr A.Devraajulu
申办方类型
Other [Self( principal investigator)]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

ADevaraajulu

Sri Venkateswara medical college hospital and research centre

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验